isgk
isgk
isgk

More than the number of times Jezebel will address Biden’s sexual assault...

I’d like to invite you to all the other races in the world who aren’t as privileged as you were growing up.   I find the group least likely to ever wash their hands are almost always Indian, next are Somalian of the groups I’ve personally worked with for any period of time.

I mean why else have interns?

True but unless you have contracted the disease it will be difficult to spread it as efficiently. With every breath your are spreading it, being encased in fluid will from a cough, sneeze and moisture in your airways allows it to stay alive outside of the body much longer than if it was just randomly spread onto

I don’t think there is a argument on the basis of gender in most things, however there are some key things about sports. Unlike most jobs of the general public the only reason anybody in sports makes anything is based purely on someone else paying to watch it and buying merch.

With sports the only reason someone is getting paid is because someone else is paying to watch it and buy merch. Doesn’t matter how hard you train or work, if people aren’t paying to watch it you aren’t going to get paid.

You will need to back up your claim that the Chinese only learned to do these things from the US... looking at the number of bodies of their own citizens left behind tells me that they didn’t need to take their cues from anybody else.

If the comedians are to be believed they in general say that right are able to take a joke at their expense but the left are not. That the extreme religious right trying to cancel people who say “wrong things” are a much smaller minority than the extreme left trying to cancel people who say “wrong things”

While in general I believe in your sentiment opensource value is “given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow” to quote E.R.S.  Meaning that over time and iterations it should eventually be more secure and bug free. The problem is that there would not be enough eyeballs on it, I’d make a guess that it would need to

I’m saying the DNC in 2016 used reprehensible tactics and they did it again in 2018 so I’m pretty sure they are using it in 2020.  Because of their willingness to do that gives Republicans cover.  They obviously haven’t learned their lesson, you can’t hold someone else accountable for doing something until you show

Nice deflection attempt there, the DNC have been playing that game against anybody that challenges them.  It’s what they do and they’ll just say “it’s just politics” which if anything gives Republicans cover to do shady shit like Trump as well.  

Ummm.... you do realize that the Russia hack of DNC information was not about getting insider strategy against Trump, or planting fake information, it was releasing actual information that the DNC intentionally put their thumb on the scale against him.   PROVE THAT DIDN’T HAPPEN

Pretty sure that’s the DNC message to Bernie supporters.  Don’t go against the establishment it doesn’t want you as the candidate.

And I’d fall in the camp that it was Iran who shot down a plane and killed a bunch of civilians, it was Soleimani who working for Iran who lead the group who killed Californian contractor Nawres Hamid who was only acting as a. linguist, it was Iran who did all those things. After all that you say it’s Trump’s fault

Have to file a lawsuit first, this was something that has zero importance in reality. I can pay a lawyer to send thousands of letters to you and you don’t have to do crap with them; heck you can crap on them and it will have the same level of power.  

And if Iran hadn’t been operating clandestine military operations in Iraq the US wouldn’t have killed Soleimani. How far down this road of blame do you want to go?  Back to before the Ottoman Empire because we probably could figure out a way to do it.

I’d say IQ measures intelligence extremely well, but it is not a good measure of success as there are so many other factors other than intelligence on being successful.

You are going to want to edit/delete that post as your are making claims of facts not opinions that if you can’t prove open you up to legal lawsuits. Your factual claim of “legal dodge on premeditated murder”, you will need to be able to bring proof of it if you don’t want to be able to be sued.

Can you provide any proof of that or are you just projecting your bias as to how you want the situation to be?