Well maybe that’s the way they do it there in your small area, but doing a google search shows no results doing it the way you mention. In fact the link you provided earlier they talk about using guns to shoot them. Majority of links I found were about calling in the animal to where it’s close enough to shoot, again…

Well the state group managing it is called the “Dept of Natural Resources” so probably that’s what he means. Also why would that be a problem anyway?  A resource is useful, is scarce (not unlimited) and has value.

Are you sure you are talking about Bob cats?  The way you are talking would destroy any value the animal would have with the dogs killing it. 

All I know is that escalation hasn’t changed anyone’s mind. At best they agree with you out of fear, and like a pet who obey’s your command out of fear if you every show any weakness in your ability to induce fear in them they will reverse in on you and use fear to force your to agree at worst it will drive people…

Exactly, the Germans conflated the power of the (very, very) few Jews who actually were wealthy and some privilege/prestige and then disparaged all groups. Arguing that a whole “white group” has power is the same tactic used by the Germans; i.e. tie the two together. Of course whites have majority power in the US, but…

Sorry but there’s no need for that level of escalation, it brings nothing of value to the table and only closes people’s minds further.

Actually it started by saying that the Jews had the power and control, and they were the reason that German people were so poor so it was OK to treat them poorly. They were simply oppressing the oppressors, it wasn’t until later after that they changed from Jews have the power to they are animals. Which is why the…

1: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

Well... when you used it before to describe someone as racist here before it most surely would.  So were you wrong before calling a person racist or wrong now?

No that is not the definition of racism.  As a child of an immigrant, who’s actually visited Buchenwald concentration camp, it’s really scary to see people try to redefine racism so that “their person” doesn’t fall under it.  

I’m sorry many of these aren’t responses to someone else in twitter, she was the one who started the posts.   She obviously is racist.

I don’t believe the printing specifically the lower receiver is what allows it to fire fully automatic, it’s the one part of a AR15 that is required to have markings on it. Those markings require background checks, etc before purchasing. Without those markings it’s considered basically just a piece of metal and…

Well over two decades ago she admitted to being diagnosed bi-polar and multiple personality disorder

The part that was missing is this:

Lynching is already illegal in all 50 states in the US, this is pure and simply a public play for votes move that does nothing, but makes them “look good”.

Maybe in your liberal, urban bubble you should read some news, and really, really rethink as to why “this makes me so, so nervous”, because if you stepped out of your bubble you might actually be informed rather than scared of your shadow. You would see that the UNHRC has condemned Israel more than every other country…

Ummm.... Warren Buffet’s firm non-predatory?

I’m not saying he isn’t a total waste of a person, but I do wonder if there is a unique impact of court ruling that the President’s twitter is a official government channel so he can’t block people, that a logical side effect is that Twitter possibly might not be able to block people because of that ruling, because it…

I thought something more interesting would be a claim that since the President can’t block people on Twitter because the courts determined it was being used as an official communication channel that banning him is intentionally preventing him from accessing government information

If Seattle really wanted to help their program they would have taxed everybody. You could make it progressive and tax higher valued property, income, etc more but no they knew that people don’t want *their* taxes to go up, they want someone else’s taxes to go up.