Umm.. do you have any proof of your analogy? What I know of Germany’s health care at the time was that Hitler changed from the previous Bismarck regime in 1871 which set up the first healthcare for all, was keeping healthcare for all but moving all control over it under centralized government. Feel free to correct me…

According to the CDC there are approx 3.5 million people with chronic Hep C.

But if only the militia had them all the people who used them for food would be dead.

You made the claim they didn’t intend for people to have a gun, when it is more than obvious that in the 1700's during the revolutionary war they already had guns, not just for an army/militia but for food, etc. You are making the claim that they didn’t intend for people to have guns when it already was a way of life…

Except none of those links show anything about having a gun. Sure they talk about a well regulated militia but it doesn’t backup your assumption at all. You are making a rather large leap of faith.

Umm pretty sure when it was written most households had guns for food, fighting against the British, or protection. They may not have intended everyone to have a fully automatic weapon (as it hadn’t been invented yet), but that’s a whole different thing than what you are saying.

The baker wouldn’t sell wedding cakes to gay couples at all with no suggestion that they would necessarily be different than a plain type he would gladly sell to a straight couple. Open-and-shut anti-gay discrimination.

If you believe that, then it shows how little you really know.

This is one of the first images on their website which I’d say could be confused with T-Mobile. Not sure how their material is normally marketed if this image is prominently used, or not which could have a big impact.

Because that’s Title IX and one of the many issues it has. Others ones are from it’s expansion in 2011 from “clear and convincing” standard to “preponderance of evidence”. See below for some other parts of Title IX that are rather eye opening in my view (no bad faith, ill will, etc required just showing disparate…

In this situation I’m not sure it had anything to do with Trump’s bidding. Trump was against the AT&T merger from the beginning on the campaign trail and is still very much against it. Basically AT&T paid Cohen $600k to try and influence him to make the merger happen and it looks like they could have put on the ground…

car·a·van

Oh definitely there are lots of sites but do you disagree that Gawker sites disparage Reddit as basically a cesspool of the right? When in reality it mostly has no bias since anybody can create any sub (actually it leans left because there are more left leaning people on the Internet).

Maybe I’m confused but I can’t think of a time that broken bones/lacerations required > 24 hours hospitalization additionally those don’t fall under body lost or permanent disfigurement either. It seems that those two sentences were put together for no reason other than to imply a direct correlation. Are there any…

Actually no I hang out in specific subs relative to business, I just am informed and understand that Reddit allows extremes from both sides and everything in the middle, pretty much like the Internet in general. However the authors and people around here seem to think that it’s only one sided, where it’s really Gawker…

And there are just as many opposite of that. Believe Republicans should be taken out back and shot... they are there. Believe men are the root of all evil, all of those types of subs are there as well.

Doing the math... $7.75 million judgement around $1 million paid to drivers. If all of the money went to the drivers (no attorney, state, etc fees), lets round up let’s say it was 8x instead of 7.75x.

So what you are saying is that he should have intentionally hid that information until after the election. That he should not act impartially and instead buried it.

The smell!!! Dear God the smell!!

And a Sonos system controlled by Alexa sounds even better