isgk
isgk
isgk

I've not studied chaotic systems formally in over 20 years, but I'd disagree with this statement: " Not because we lack information (problem with randomness) but because of just how much effort it would take to calculate."

Hobbyists are also very affected by the new FAA "clarifications", they now say that FPV flying your RC is not allowed under the model aircraft allowances. All those gorgeous videos that have been put up on Gizmodo over the years... most of them have been piloted through FPV. If this FAA rule stands it will take a

Honestly I can say that my On Demand with my Comcast cable has more selections and options than Netflix, Hulu, Amazon. I can watch those things when I want to just like Netflix, but unlike Netflix it actually has new content and no additional cost (buffet style). True there is a substantial cost difference if you

Unfortunately combining it doesn't make it less dangerous (it is odorless and affects are delayed so you can breath in a fatal dose and not even know it)

Exactly, some words that people use today are really outdated. We need to revamp the 1st ammendment to take out hurtful offensive words, they weren't offensive back in the day but now nobody should be using them anymore.

No it's because for significantly less money than Beats, I can buy something that is *much* better. For even less than that I can buy something that has the same sound quality as Beats... it's less on the audiophile quality and more about the "there's a sucker born every minute" part of Beats that people complain

Not only that but any packet loss will make your large static packages move really, really slow.

There were lots of requests to extend the Space Shuttle program, but it was cornerstone space policy of President Obama to stop Bush's constellation rocket program, retire the Shuttle in 2010 and rely on the Russians and private companies.

Actually there are lots of laws about doing just that. A patent protects an idea that is publicly known, where as trade secrets, etc protect information not publicly known. Carmack signed a letter promising to not disclose that information to others, so even if it's not patented he cannot legally reuse it somewhere

Well I wouldn't go that far. Earlier in the year Netflix did the net neutrality play fuck against Comcast, where unless Comcast paid to peer with Netflix specific CDN they intentionally wouldn't provide super HD streams to them. And actually if one read the FCC net neutrality law, it would be happening because in

Hold on a minute... Obama in 2008 (same time as CEO guy) said this:

How do you know they did before everyone? That's the problem with this conversation... OK you got the NSA to not use backdoors, what about every other country who also has smart people on their payroll, intelligence level isn't really bounded by national borders.

No these are the people who when you say there are inconsistencies they yell "benghaaaazzzzziiii" at you trying to frame the conversation as a hit job that it's was only a protest, when they are factually incorrect... they haven't moved on they actively engage kind but are horribly misinformed.

No it's more of a personal wonder why still today, the facts are that a protest wasn't part of it, it was stated by direct eyewitnesses a couple of days after, confirmed a couple of weeks after, admitted to in Senate hearings, etc but large swathes of the populace who would consider themselves informed individuals

The CIA gave the White House their talking points, and before Susan Rice spoke the CIA also gave the White House a statement that eye witnesses say there was no protest. The White House decided to not bring up that additional information and instead ran with a "it's was because of a movie" claim.

"So?"

I'm only using Bush as example as when the embassy was attacked there, his administrations media response was completely different. There was nothing he ever had to go back on, there was no official mouthpiece having to retract anything. That's the difference the response, where when the embassy was attacked under

No doubt they are going to drag it out as long as possible, the Dems did it to Bush as well it's normal operations in politics. The problem is the Obama administration has gone back and forth on things, officially denying things months later to reporters that are then found to be false. It's because new things keep

The factcheck.org link said what you quoted, I notice you intentionally cut off the next sentence which is why the fact checkers are calling him out on it, because he explicitly said that he intenionally didn't use "terrorism".