iseeveritas
HeyZeuS
iseeveritas

I've had my B.E. for less than a year so I'm not going to question BMW engineers but in my experience with water/meth injection its basically useless. I worked for a company my freshman year doing aftermarket performance and our shop car was a tube frame, 6 second, Buick Grand National. We put a pretty expensive

If this actually factors into your decision to buy a vehicle I honestly don't know what to say... Also, most Mercedes models in 2015 still have them, even $70k+ AMG's.

Now playing

Did you see the accompanying YouTube video on the Cadillac channel? It is also titled "." and is 5 minutes long but shows nothing but a Cadillac crest and a white screen . I wonder if its some crazy attempt at a viral marketing campaign.

Yeah perhaps I should have made the sarcasm clearer. I was just listing the "official" and commonly believed reasons for the rule. People who actually believe those cars make our roads or air unsafe are probably dangerous themselves.

Everything you wrote is correct except for the import rule. It has absolutely nothing to do with marketing and everything to do with safety, theft, crash test, and emissions standards.

Stop ISIL? By eroding Wahhabism/Salafism and the inferiority complex rampant throughout the Islamic world. You're correct, Kurdistan is well overdue but that's because they have demonstrated the ability to have a functioning secular democracy in an area of the world where no one thought it was possible. A "Sunni

To put it simply, they are the remnants of al-Zarqawi's al-Qaeda in Iraq. All are Wahhabi/Salafist Sunnis and come mostly from Iraq, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Yemen, and Qatar with smaller contingents from western Europe and Chechnya. Their history probably starts with the U.S. disbanding Iraq's military post 2003

You're crazy if you don't think CIA, MI6, Mossad, etc don't already have HUMINT operations in place against ISIL, but their effectiveness is another matter entirely. Islamic terrorist networks are notoriously hard to infiltrate due to a combination of familial ties between members and very robust counterintelligence

Your 3rd point is absolutely ridiculous.

In Cadillacs case it's so they can advertise 50/50 weight distribution for the ATS and CTS.

I've seen a handful in Warren near the tech center. Looks a lot better in person, pictures don't do it justice. My dad might order one as his next PEP car so I can tag it for a nice discount.

GMC is perfectly suited for a "premium off-road" segment. Take all the styling and off road prowess (what little there was) from Hummer and give it GMC tweaked looks and interior upgrades. No sense in going for the sub $30k market, not enough money to be made. GMC already has some of the highest ATP's in the industry

The Air Force version has a 25mm internal cannon. The Marine Corps and Navy version have an attachable gun pod as well but won't use it most of the time because it affects the LO nature of the plane.

In 21st century warfare anything could be a surface combatant and everything is a valid target. Nobody else is playing by the rules, why should we?

I see the logic behind your theory and definitely think the CT6 will be the technological forbear to the CT8 or whatever the true flagship will be called. But, I don't see Cadillac releasing a great car like the CT6 that will hopefully change brand perceptions, then throw the model out altogether when the flagship is

Two of my friends made the switch from a Cruze to a Dart. Both wish they hadn't. Having driven my roommates extensively last year I can honestly say its a terrible car. The ergonomics are awful, throttle and brake are touchy as hell, and the whole thing feels cheap. The infotainment and aesthetics are good however.

1. ATS 2. CTS 3. SS 4. Regal GS

Wow, sweet ride! I would have loved to do more work to my S/C 3800 but unfortunately mine wasn't facing the right direction or powering the right wheels. Also I found out the hard way that the HD in 4T65E-HD doesn't mean much.