Or call the show "pretty damn comic accurate this time".

I thought most of her scenes which showed her trying to cope with her grief were vague for the most part. I liked the scenes where she confronted Mark and started to kind of "take charge" again, snapped out of her despair, and also her scenes with Ellie at the end. I just felt it came a bit too late in the latter…

I'm a newcomer to Broadchurch(started watching after the Thirteenth Doctor announcement) and so far I've only finished the first season. I was looking forward to seeing Jodie Whittaker's performance, but in that season she was given next to nothing to do. Does that improve in Season 2 and 3?

Avengers is firmly in 2012. Civil War made explicit mention of the Avengers having come into existence four years before, though. So if Avengers is 2012, CW is 2016, and Iron Man is 2008. No other way about it.

Speaking of, Marvel should just clarify if they had indeed changed the timeline of the MCU. Because Civil War and Homecoming contradicts each other hard.

I think there are some websites tracking the viewer numbers somehow.

Universally panned? I think this clearly shows how often times, critics are just the vocal minority.

In retrospect, the first season had three Doctors!

Seems like a weird thing to say, considering the first two movies(and it looks like this one will follow suit) were among the best-reviewed movies of their respective release year.

Hope he comes back with a strong album after this. Pablo had bright spots, but ultimately felt too scattered. The constant rearranging didn't help, either.

Well, they both are the first incarnations of their respective regeneration cycle after all!

No Jack Antonoff's second the Bleachers album? That's my album of the year contender.

We really do need another one. It's been, what, over a decade since Manderlay?

Years? Some nutjobs already seriously made that kind of statement a few days ago.

I think this would've been better in a wacky comedy-drama format, honestly. But then again we've already got Supernatural.

Agreed, which is why I found the tidbits of reviews and tweets about those movies praising it to hell and back jarring. And I personally don't think most of those actually think that, they're just hyping their reviews for clicks.

Eh, probably? All three Iron Man movies, the first Cap movie, both Thor movies, the first Avengers movie, all had CGI-heavy third act battles that were just prolonged fights without any real narrative thread. In comparison, WW's third act battle was shorter while being at roughly the same level of perfunctory. In all…

I've had my e-mail subscribed to one of the comic book news website a few years ago and I can't figure out how to unsubscribe from it. Every time a comic book movie comes around, I've got an alert for their article compiling reviews and tweets from critics. Guess I just see more of them than you.

Don't blame directors for that. Blame the audience. A big climactic CGI battle sells movies. The general audience don't really care about plot and character developments, they go to the movies for big spectacle action. I've seen a fair share of people who thought Logan was terrible and boring, and the recent Mummy…

I remember reviews saying Ant-Man was the best solo Marvel movie yet, threatening to replace Iron Man's place in that regards. Then Doctor Strange came around and the same praise was sung. Now the upcoming Spider-Man Homecoming is also touted with the same thing, from the lifted social media embargo yesterday. Critics…