If you honestly think this is about you saying “thank you” rather then reasonably sharing a perspective with you, then I have nothing to tell you.

Ah! Ad hominem in an otherwise respectable banter between, what I had assumed, two adults.

The irony of course being how, considering you where the first to resort to such a low level behaviour, you’re clearly not ready yet.

Good to know that snippets outweighing the overall content of an artistic piece is an acceptable opinion.

Being worried about spoilers in general is dumb. Darth Vader is Luke’s Father. Yet the story in between and the build up to it is what matters. Not that small fact.

Just a reminder. If out of context snippets can ruin a large piece of experience, that are usually created to be enjoyed from start to finish, to you, then perhaps you should reconsider how you generally enjoy things.

Who needs sources when you got a sweet PS4 pic.

Bayonetta for starters. I mean she doesn't hunt people per-se, but I'm sure hunting sentient beings still counts for being a hunter and by virtue a hunter can qualify as a bounty hunter.

To be honest, there was nothing new after you have fought all three types of enemies. Sure new weapons, but by then it was more about overpowering the player.

Inadmissible, there should not have to be a "real mode" to validate a games quality. Source: Dark Souls

That an Adblock has a white list for those who pay them enough.

There has been good AI? Also, closing off areas is not a new thing nor would I consider it a bad thing (or good if you are interested in knowing).

None of those games on the list are groundbreaking to begin with. Hell, I can't even think of any groundbreaking games of 2013.

You would think that they would learn about throwing money at developers for actual exclusives. But hey, I guess marketing gimmicks and a few games is enough for them.

It is like nobody in this industry understands their demographic.

You have to accept this as its own platform. The difference between this and a backwards compatible console is that Sony has to continuously pay to keep this up. Hardware wise, they only pay one large sum to have that PS1/2 processing chip in there new console and that is it.

Isn't there air strikes in Dead Rising? That is an action. Not essential mind you, but my point still stands. Don't you think a button could have easily remedied such feature?

Why would I want a technical for screaming at my TV? Are we talking about immersion again? Please reread what I said earlier.

You mean a button couldn't have supplemented such feature? Oh wait, it totally could have. It would have been faster and more responsive as a button.

Because everyone moves while playing? That makes it worst for those who don't and those who do (subconsciously). Games are about complete control. So, I have to remember to move or remember to not move (assuming I do it subconsciously)? I don't know about you but that sounds shitty.

Also, were you implying that a motion and voice based accessory will work in tandem with a controller but strictly through the usage of voice? We couldn't just, I don't know, supplement such feature through a microphone?

I never said there were though, but it has been heavily touted as being a possible usage for it.