That is your opinion thought. I really didn't like GTA 4 gameplay but that doesn't stop it from being a top selling game.
Doesn't matter how you feel about the game as not everyone shares your opinion. Therefore it probably did sell a million despite how you feel.

6 months is a lot of time, so I don't see why its so hard to believe. Most big titles gain millions withing weeks.

That thread is from 2012. In a recent IGN podcast with Shuhei, Shuhei explicitly states that it has sold around a million. I wouldn't be surprised that that particular number is padded with vita sells included and other nonsense.

VGChartz makes up numbers. Shuhei Yohida had already stated that it has sold 1 million units.

I am not saying that DRM on PC is their fault. I'm saying that it clearly being done wrong. No one in the right mind would yell cheers for DRM.

That they can serve up anything to its customers and ultimately sell it because it has its brand on it.

• The first one is remark on how these "hypothetical" DLCs would be more interesting "story wise" compared to what the Last of Us offered.

I use to be though. I'm pretty knowledgeable of the pokemon universe. At least when it comes to the original up to the Ruby Sapphire era. According to this list, even those who were fans still evolve.

I'm not a betting man, so I wont be placing all my eggs in that basket yet. Tell you what though, I'll eat my hat if there is a grade A game that gets release on the Kinect 2.

I was just saying that new and refreshing doesn't equal fun. Yes, Kinect games can be new and refreshing but that doesn't mean they will be fun.

I'm very appreciative of that. I too am glad that we argued. I don't aim to change people's minds or hurt anyone for that matter and I really did hope that you would have been grateful of what we discussed. Overall, we talked without calling each other names or personally attacking each other, so I had assumed we…

Hmm, are joking because you can't argue like an adult? I was hoping you would just not reply, but should you had I would have respected you more if you tackled it as an adult. Not saying you should continue arguing but its would be more respectable if you simply kept your word and said that you opted not to continue.

I've been approaching this strictly objectively.

I haven't played Pokemon...since ruby I think? I don't hate the series, nor do I care for it. So where do I fit in on this list? Purple line?

Except it does. Do you recall why you made that remark? I made mentions how to fully appreciate its value, one would have to play a Kinect centric game. Which you assumed I was speaking strictly motion gaming. By assuming that I believed that was its primary function you replied with "it has other features". You had…

Gamers want new and refreshing games, but not at the cost of them being boring. You can gamble with the Kinect if you want, but I need you to understand one thing. Gamers want "fun" experiences first. You know, because games are a form of "entertainment".

Your argument is that by my logic you should not buy a console because you don't use all the features. My counter is stating that consoles primarily are for processing games, everything else is a metaphorical icing.

Except your quote is "Kinect 2.0 is not only motion gaming". The implication being that it is not primarily for motion gaming. Meaning that it can not be perceived as only motion gaming as everything it offers makes it more than motion gaming. Therefore everything else is not a nifty features.

I know, that is why I quoted you saying "Kinect 2.0 is not only motion gaming". Can you read?

But is voice command really worth $100 dollars more? The game offers so much at the cost of $60. Is voice command really $100 more.