ioloveithere
ImWithMe
ioloveithere

Not that you care, but white men are now CONSTANTLY told that we didn’t earn anything we have. That we need to shut up. That we are ‘mansplaining’ and appropriating and white-washing and not only do we hear these things constantly, but it’s all OK to say (and I’m sure you are thinking right now that I should shut up

As a fellow liberal straight white man (with a beard, no less!) I’m so glad that THIS one has arrived to tell me I’m doing it all wrong. Finally!

He spent 6 years as a pow. He declined to leave when offered. What the fuck have you done? His grandfather, father and son ALL service members. One more time; what the fuck have you or anyone you know done that even slightly compares?

Are you surprised he has the ball to do it?

I’m torn about Lance giving anyone shit about doping.

Pretty wild that Stormfront can’t find a single fucking grammar nazi.

Hillbots:

The way some Clinton supporters treated Nate over last few months was vile. He was one of the only people who kept on saying that this is not a sure thing, go and have a look at his mentions and you will see people screaming at him because he did not have Hillary at 99% chance of winning.

Huh? Silver was consistently attacked for weeks because his win probability for Clinton was “way too low”. He comes out of this looking way way better than nearly every other statistician (after consistently being horribly wrong for 15 months, but hey).

Yeah, he’s a weird scapegoat in this saga. Flash back a week and a half ago and there were people all over the internet (including on this family of websites) writing pieces about how he was being way too bullish about Trump’s chances. Now, we’re blaming him for not being bullish enough...

Silver constantly warned that this election was different given the volatility in the polls and the large amount of undecided voters. He also warned that there was a significant possibility that Trump would win the Electoral College, but would lose the popular vote. Nate Cohn at the Upshot, however, was completely

Nate Silver’s model was the only one which gave Trump a good chance of winning. Take it up with the Huffington Post and Sam Wang; they gave Clinton close to a 99% chance of winning....

Counterpoint: sometimes it’s reassuring when the teams you’re expecting to lose meet expectations.

Seems to be operating within normal parameters.

Bernie Sanders has been polling in recent months as literally the most popular politician in the United States. Clinton diehards are going to blame people who would have voted for him, but voted for Stein, Johnson, or Trump. Imagine how many votes that must be, particularly in the midwest, that would have gone to

For the life of me I’ll never understand why the democrats cleared the decks to anoint a candidate who had already failed miserably in 2008 and who revealed herself to be isolated and utterly out of touch with the electorate.

I learned that you are clearly a misogynistic misogynist if you think anything other than misogyny caused this misogynistic mess. Don’t criticize Hillary’s perfect campaign, misogynist! Misogyny.

This is, by far, a better morning after take than the ones over on The Slot that, so far, are only blaming Gary Johnson, Jill Stein, and their voters.

Yeah we (I voted for Clinton in the primary so I’ll own it) hardcore misjudged how strong the midwestern populism was this year.

Hillary would have lost even if all 3rd party voters had voted for her. Majority of white voters voting Trump and the gutting of the of the Voting Rights Act, that probably took away votes that she could have used to swing a couple states, is the reason.