I don’t think you understand my post. (Did you even read it or just look for keywords?). I think Lena’s behavior in total, as described in her own words, indicates sexual impropriety and deviation with regards to her sister. I would not immediately conclude a six or seven year old (a small child who likely does not…

I know diabetics who added chocolate to their daily diet because of “all the evidence” they were reading about as to the benefits of chocolate. They’ll never read the truth because all the media outlets that covered this “story” are certainly not going to follow up on it. But hey, at least the reckless practices of…

No, that’s not exactly true. As a child, I was victimized by other children, and it has had a very serious and traumatic effect on me my entire life. Two seven-year-olds playing doctor aren’t necessarily victimizing each other, but that doesn’t mean they “don’t need consent.” It can turn into a traumatic event if one…

looking curiously at your one-year-old sister’s vagina when you’re seven, and repeatedly touching your sisters’ and other children’s vagina and breasts when you’re 14 and they’re asleep.

Dude.

the reading that Dunham molested her younger sister Grace by peering into her vagina when the girl was a toddler.

Well, point proven.

Neither get a pass, both are sick fucking people. Guess it is parents fault, but think goodness most “good parents” taught “good touch bad touch” at the very young age of 5. Again Lena and Dugger are very sick people who should be in jail for life or 10-25 years and have the title sex offender.

I almost feel like it’s more than “a little” reckless.

I want to see the value here in bringing the shady workings of the industry to light, but I’m afraid you’ve almost done too good a job. The research and subsequent articles that were spawned from it likely had the same effect on those people who are desperate enough to try anything as the same bunk studies you set out…

“The idea that progressivism leads a person to not take child molestation seriously is a deliberately blockheaded conclusion that I wouldn’t entertain except for the fact that, right now, it’s being widely resuscitated in the name of Josh Duggar, who we now know was once investigated by police for committing sexual…

I think Josh Duggar abused his sisters at 14. I think when Lena Dunham rubbed one off at 17 next to her 12 year old sister she was being abusive.

OF COURSE, a 7 year-old is entitled to completely non-sexual curiosity about the human body. I played “doctor” with my friends. Shit happens. Nobody was getting off on it.

Let’s start by clarifying that consent has no place in a discussion of child molestation. A child can’t consent his or her way to a molestation.

So how did Lena Dunhams sister give consent?

I’m as liberal as they come, but I cannot defend Lena Dunham. She put pebbles in her sister’s vagina. That is awful. A one-year old cannot do that. I have a one-year old right now. The intent wasn’t “molestation,” but it wasn’t innocent either.

So are we now just pretending Dunham’s behavior stopped when she was seven? Is that our chosen defense mechanism?

Matt Walsh is a sanctimonious scum bag. That said I’m still not cool with Dunhams actions either.

Nah. Both are child molesters and shitty people. Didn't you once say you were to smart to be raped? You suck too.

Yeah, but which isomer?