intheweeds
intheweeds
intheweeds

That's all I ask. For the truth, see these 14, hour-long videos about why the SJWs are planning to kill all men.

Wow. What a one-sided article. The vote spam is actually about ethics in games journalism.

Sadly, working in Toronto has only increased my ire and desire to taunt Leaf's fans at every turn:

I'm a queer Jew with relatives who are Holocaust survivors. One of them pointed out to me once that, out of all the people who were targeted by Nazis and survived the Holocaust, there was only one group of people who could not speak openly about what they endured and have their suffering recognized. Those were LGBT

I am aware of what a Petrodollar is, but did not want to over-complicate the analogy of fiat currencies. The word you are looking for to describe your desire to play the role of Wikipedia is 'pedantic'.

The journalistic integrity of an author has been called into question, and true to Jezebel ethics and practices, she fires back with middle school sarcasm.

Frankly you should be. In ignoring the actual content of the controversy you fail to add anything of value to the conversation. You'd have been better off simply ignoring the topic all together, but now that you've waded in it's pretty sad to see you do so disingenuously.

Everyone has different opinions. Being flippant about sexual abuse and leaving out giant chunks of relevant information IS embarrassing. Your snarky response is gross.

A home run? This article completely ignores multiple other examples of Dunham's disturbing behavior with her sister. Was it done on purpose or out of the author's total ignorance of the actual details of the story?

This is exactly what I was thinking. As I read this, I thought " I really hope that if a famous male celebrity described his 7 year old self touching his brother's penis or sister's vagina would be offered the same explanations and justifications" Because I don't believe a 7 year old doing bodily exploration is a

Yes. There are 1 year olds who could do that. But if you were to ask me which is the more likely scenario: a 1 year old putting pebbles in her vagina immediately followed by the moment a 7 year old coincidentally decided to look at her sister's vagina OR a 7 year old lying about having put pebbles in her 1 year old

Here's the only issue I have. Dunham is getting quite the pass while others (Chris Brown) aren't. I'm not saying CB should get a pass. I address that in a separate Jez article. The narrative for him from him seems to be, "I was young, it happened, I'm still paying for it, Rihanna and I are good, when will the public

AND, her sister Grace said, "Without getting into specifics," she said, "most of our fights have revolved around my feeling like Lena took her approach to her own personal life and made my personal life her property."

THANK YOU. One more thing: Lena also relishes in delivering her sister bad news (like their grandfather dying) because it would mean that her sister would give her attention. That is some next level shit.

They want to defend Lena and the only way to do so is to omit.

Why are we acting like this is only about her touching her 1 year old sister's vagina when she was 7 and not also about emotionally coercing her sister into sleeping in her bed and then masturbating while she sleeps? And about paying her sister in candy to give her long kisses on the lips? And about paying her sister

You left out the part where she talks about masturbating while her sister was in the bed with her. I've not been one to say OMG SEXUAL ABUSE but clearly boundaries and tack were lacking in the Dunham household. And it's just weird for people to be like "Oh she's just quirky." If she wasn't famous and just that woman

I think my biggest issue with this whole fiasco is not the acts Lena describes, but that she so cavalierly mentions that she did what a sexual predator would do (as I realize you discuss in this article). I realize that this is her brand of humor and maybe I just don't get her humor, but it is an out-of-touch,

Ooh, this tea...