So, everyone needs to get their formula right with this one.

It's not [thing] + [thing going tragically wrong] + [Jeanette Daniels Benziger making an optimistic comment about the tragedy] (as the Challenger, Titanic , end of the universe and Columbine examples have done)

It's [thing] + [thing going tragically wrong]…

There would be if you flew there with Virgin Airlines.

I love the model's unmistakable "How the fuck did this even happen?" face.

I for one am just sick of people Shuckleing at the teets of companies like this for free hand-outs.

I cannot disagree with the idea that real-life James Franco should be more like his character in Pineapple Express.

This is why I loathe, loathe Franco. He absolutely got into his program through his fame and wealth, and used the same to publish an entire collection of terrible stories, along with essays such as this.

Someone used a Bukowski book to seduce the single demographic Bukowski most loathed?

Good on him, somehow.

No. A lot of BS just uses his writing as justification.

The Time I Accidentally Got Way Too High also ended up being The Last Time I Smoked Pot.

Realized it was never worth the pangs of paranoia and self-loathing it brought with it. Power to you if it's your thing, but I'll stick with alcohol and tobacco.

Given the one participant in that chat who says he more or less thinks of women as dudes with with vaginas/non-humans, I'd say we can up that 80% to 90-95.

Well, at least you've taken an interesting approach?

For real, though: Feeling unloved and unsuccessful in love are things most humans experience; they're not limited to either gender. Most people aren't bombshells. Everyone is going to get rejected, and that's if they're even confident enough to act on an attraction…

Holy. Fuck.

Just throwing another comment onto all those that have gone in depth into the California laws, but — yes, it varies by state. For a non-California example, I used to work in journalism in Nebraska, and there it was legal to record a conversation as long as just one party was aware and consented to it (which, handily,…

Not convinced either way yet (but, hey! that's why we have a judicial system), but there are plenty of reasons to give the plaintiff the benefit of the doubt if the time gap is your only concern:

* Many, many victims of abuse only feel comfortable or realize the extent of their abuse years later

* Fifteen years ago…

Yes, this. Also, and this should be noted as no less important, I really want to see Wolverine fight things.

As a guy, I agree with shower sex being less than glamorous. You can feel things just ... not working quite right. Unpleasant for both parties.

Have you ever tried penetration in a body of water? It's not fun with vaginas; I can only imagine the difficulties involved with an orifice not specifically designed for sex.

The circumstances described in the lawsuit, if true, do not violate his consent any less for the presence of $600. Nor does the presence of $600, without any designation of job duties, tile or position a prostitute make.

Yeah, I really could have done without feeling like I need a shower after clicking on this.

It's funny what the word "lurid" does to a headline, especially when inviting me to read it. (Which I did, because I'm filthy.)