If you had been born back then, your morality would have reflected the community standards of the day, and you’d probably have relished that sermon, and been clamouring for your own narrow conception of justice as well.
If you had been born back then, your morality would have reflected the community standards of the day, and you’d probably have relished that sermon, and been clamouring for your own narrow conception of justice as well.
I don’t think it it did work, but as long as hipsters want ironic crap on their bookshelves to show their commitment to ironic humor, a book like that will sell well.
I’ll bet the only reason they admit a tenuous connection to Little Women is because it’s in the public domain. Otherwise, they’d be calling it “totally original”. It seems such a departure from the supposed source material that they really should have claimed it was an original.
Cool, if you thrive on that sort of thing.
I’m complaining about the point of the article, but I’m not wringing my hands over whether or not they go through the rigmarole of showing us that Harley used to be Joker’s shrink until he corrupted her. I bet they will, but why not just, you know, wait and see? Then people can commence the circle-jerk over how…
You wouldn't rather have JCVD from 16-years ago than Channing Tatum today?
Even still, who gives a shit? It’s like if there was a green lantern movie and someone says: “I hope Kilowog says “poozers!””.
Will Suicide Squad Tell Harley Quinn’s Origin Story?
When the comedy revolution comes, Sandler will be the first to be shot, alongside the people who write for the “scary movie” franchise. I hope they all die from some kind of nutsack cancer.
Might have been a good movie if they shot it back in 1999 with Van Damme because he wasn’t over the hill yet. The other thing that would have made it tolerable is that I was 17-years old back in 1999. Everything is better when you are 17.
Those people are imbeciles.
I’ve politely disagreed with a lot of people who are convinced that aspartame is bad for you, just because it’s “a chemical”.
You are only going to scare or further upset them, and teach them that strangers are frightening and make them only more anxious in social situations, and more likely to act out further in the future...and so on.
I think people have this idea that just because kids are cute, they are inherently “good”. Ever see how some kids behave? Kids are capable of absolute cruelty. I think you may be right in your assessment of their fundamental nature.
I’m still dying to know why you feel this way. I have a feeling you’d agree that whether it’s nice or not, a person has a right to raise their voice to someone who is causing trouble. Do you really feel that right can’t be exerted just because that individual is someone’s child?
The computer is obviously meant to torment people, much like the computer in Harlan Ellison’s story “I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream”.
I feel bad for the women who do this on purpose; I guess because they want a genteel, feminine gait, because it looks so damn stupid. It brings back memories of high-school. There were these three gorgeous, popular girls who sat in the back of the class, and they all got stellar marks; but whenever called-on by the…
A corporation makes money, and the average joe-schmo gets to feel good about immigrants being degraded. That seems to be what makes this country tick these days.
It’s weird as hell that people decide to look for cogent opinions on serious issues from people just because they enjoy their screen-talents.
Nice score, man. Four-times the price! You made your buyer pay the inevitable “Takumi tax”.