Men's rights advocates call themselves men's rights advocates. So it's not derogatory, they're just assholes. They are identified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Basically, according to them, ladies/feminists cause all the problems in the world. Obviously there are gender inequalities that…
I like it when in ants-on-a-log form.
I don't have a drugstore anywhere near my house (I live in the boonies) and I seriously can't find them online ANYWHERE.
So, I just discovered a month too late that this: [www.huffingtonpost.com] is a thing that exists.
WTF! I hope you yelled at them when you found out.
I wasn't ready to order when the rest of my party was ready to order, so he took all of their orders, got to me, I was undecided, so he left, put all their orders in, wouldn't respond when we tried to flag him down because he was chatting with the other waiters. The next time we saw him, he brought all my friends…
Dear waiters who treat college students badly because they're college students,
Haha, I'm glad my words weren't entirely wasted.
If you are saying "trigger warning", you are not saying you are a victim. You are acknowledging that victims exist.
Because they are already built, first of all. Also because they don't want you to have to wait in line to pee. Public restrooms are super crowded already.
This is the lowest priority. I can think of no lower priorities.
No one is doing that.
Jezebel does not have a tradition of trigger warnings either. Neither site does them. It is a perfectly valid thing to do for the reasons stated above, regardless of the gender of the people involved. Obviously lots of women do not want trigger warnings and thus go on sites, such as a Gawker or Jezebel, where such…
They wouldn't have half as many bathrooms if they made bathrooms unisex. "Now that men can go in the women's restroom, we'll just fence the men's restroom off and let no one use it!" The average number of people in the bathrooms at any given time would be the same.
I doubt it would make a difference, but I do think it would cause a lot of women to feel less safe, for sure, and I can definitely imagine it providing more opportunities for people to look over the top of the stall at women peeing and the like.
For single rooms that is a totally different scenario. There is no reason why those couldn't be unisex. But I definitely don't think that all public restrooms should be co-ed. I think it is important that people feel safe and comfortable. (Obviously, anyone who identifies as female should be able to use the women's…