insidersource
WhatAmIDoingHere
insidersource

Don’t go off of KBB. That’s not an awful place to start, but really holds no value in sale/purchasing. Look at other comps in your area for a more accurate resale value. I’m not sure where you’re at, but in Southeast Michigan, 200k mile examples of base model FJs go for $10-12k depending on condition. One with as much

At that point, why don’t you just throw in the Engineering and R&D time as well. Call it a 2005. That’s about as meaningful as talking about when production design was introduced. You and Shilling are trash

It’s like all of you forget about the 20+ years where the Blazer name was stuck on an SUV that was smaller than the Trax. If you wan’t to complain, go back to 1982 and start there

You should have started complaining in 1982 with the introduction of the S10 Blazer. the current Blazer is better in every measurable way than the S10 Blazer was, and that little truck did just fine for what it was. There’s nothing wrong with the Blazer right now, but for some reason, all you people that wouldn’t be

they didn’t say one of the nicest woods in the world, just one of the most sought after, which is true. Just because there’s not a shortage and it’s not as expensive as some other woods doesn’t mean it isn’t still sought after

As an American, the Zoe won’t look cool until it sits 3 inches higher, has 2 extra inches of head and leg room, and is equipped with grey plastic cladding so that everybody else on the road knows how outdoorsy I am.

where? I just had one yesterday. They cut the cheesy gordita crunch like 10 years ago and then brought it back shortly after and it’s been on the menu ever since.

Nobody suggested a convertible 5.0 foxbody?

GM sold over 100k Blazers in the last year and a half. They’re still printing money with it because at the end of the day, people buying crossovers really don’t care about the name or what it used to be

I mean, is it a Bronco/Wrangler rival? No, definitely not. Is it an attractive crossover in a sea of blah. Sure, it’s not offensive and it looks pretty good.

I don’t think that’s true. It’s at every grocery store I go to in Michigan, and was something that wasn’t remotely hard to find in any other state I’ve lived in (4).

Not if I get there first.

I know what the differences are. You can get a SS 1LE, and that’s basically what the Z28 would end up being anyways. There’s just no room between the SS 1LE and the ZL1, in price or in performance, to justify it as a new model. The 6th Gen isn’t getting a Z28

My money is on the next Nissan Z being 375hp and starting at $37k. The current Z has just over 330hp and starts at $30k, but that car came out in 2009. The only reason it’s been able to stay at that price is because they paid off the tooling almost a decade ago. Same reason why Dodge is able to sell cars with the

No, he stated that’s what he would do, but earlier in the article it was mentioned that Honda already confirmed it will be an inverse of the NSX. So front engine driving the front wheels and electric motor driving the rear wheels

How would Nissan base their new Z off of a Camaro? Unless the original comment was referring to Chevy, but why would they need a 500 hp Z28 when they SS already makes 455?

It still has the same safety regulations in place regardless of whether the “hood” covers an engine or a frunk. And the key fob command should be inoperative when the car is in gear and moving.

The fact that Lexus sold 50k cars in the second quarter is absolutely mind blowing. Who’s buying those?

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again:

Is the hammer sitting outside? Can I come by anytime to hit the Kia?