Can’t wait to see this one on my daily commute surrounded still untouched by uncut grass in your yard a year from now.

I’m glad this article came back around so I could comment on the price of the C8 again with people that claimed it was going to start at $100k+.The interior is pretty great though, as far as materials go. A little open for opinion on the layout and interior space, but having physically spent time in the C8 interior,…

I’m glad this article came back around so I could comment on the price of the C8 again with people that claimed it was going to start at $100k+.

why are articles being reposted? What’s going on at Jalopnik?

Every human is capable of making that decision. I can tell you with certainty that pedestrian is getting run the fuck over lol I’m not swerving into oncoming traffic or off a bridge and putting my family in harms way. In the words of the great Happy Gilmore:

They could afford better engineers if every UAW line worker was replaced with a robot.

But the CT5 isn’t the new XTS. The XTS was front wheel drive and based on the same platform as the Impala (“based on” does not mean “the same as”). The CT5 replaces the CTS. Which is basically the same from a distance because 5 and S have the same shape.

No, we don’t have 2 forward facing cameras. We have eyes. We have brains with cognitive ability and deductive reasoning. We aren’t programmed, we make decisions on our own based on surroundings and situation. LIDAR uses light waves to determine distance much more accurately than the combination of vision based cameras…

holy hell, it’s actually worse than I thought. Why even spell out so much detail about full self-driving capability if it isn’t a reality yet? It shadows the short, 14 word blurb about drivers needing to still be attentive. And like I already said, “I fully agree that it is 100% the consumers fault for assuming the…

fair enough gripes

I understand it’s a pre-order, but pre-ordering it is making it seem like these vehicles have the tech for fully autonomous driving capability already installed, and can just be turned on via OTA updates. Not the case. Full autonomous driving requires a lot more than a couple cameras and radar sensors in the bumpers.…

I fully agree that it is 100% the consumers fault for assuming the capabilities, but do manufacturers not have a responsibility to not exploit the ignorance and naivety? I mean, we put warnings on just about everything that seems obvious, but nobody really seems to do an adequate job of notify the customer of the…

I’m not arguing that this is a good idea for mass marketing and production. I agree with you there. I also agree that there is a lot of really dumb shit on YouTube, but of all the dumb, I think this is pretty wholesome and unoffensive entertainment. It’s not like it’s some family reviewing toys for with clickbait for…

They don’t have “full self-driving” tech. That’s the exact mindset behind people that sleep in their Tesla while moving down the road. It’s dangerous thinking and dangerous branding. They have semi autonomous features, the same as many other companies, but the other companies don’t call it “auto-pilot” because the…

What’s dumb about this?

But the car isn’t getting less capable with more weight, it’s getting significantly more capable. And why do you think that a mid engine Corvette isn’t going to have great balance and handling? I can assure you, it does.

Nobody said that, don’t twist my words and don’t be obtuse. High amounts of torque and power offset weight and still allow the vehicle to live up to it’s intended purpose. So in the case of a Ram 3500, its power and torque allows it to be a great utility and tow/hauling vehicle, despite weighing over 7,000 lbs. If it…

safety standards and regulations contribute a lot to this. But having a car under 3500 lbs doesn’t matter much when it has enough torque and power to change the earth’s rotation.

because this car is designed to turn

The CYBERTRUCK not actually having bulletproof windows. Such a letdown