inperspective
inperspective
inperspective

As I said in a previous comment, it's not that different to me than Lulu allowing women to objectify and rate men without their consent for the 'betterment of women and their ability to make informed dating decisions' or whatever they fuck their credo is.

NOOOOOOPE.

There was a Groupthink on embarrassing crushes. I picked Tom Brokaw. This guy though? I can't even. Not even if I try really really hard. Not even if he wore a Brokaw mask. I'm more attracted to my houseplants.

Look, dude, rape isn't about sex. Rape is about power. Rapists, like any other criminals, have no respect for their victim's autonomy of self or will. Combine that with an unchecked sense of entitlement, and that's how you get what we see in today's rape statistics. And that's why about 2/3 of rapists cross 0ver into

'Real' negative experiences.
Like what exactly? All I have heard is that uncut is less hygienic (which is bullshit, it takes about 5 seconds to pull the foreskin back and clean it), uncut causes more STDs (again untrue), being cut doesn't reduces the amount of sexual pleasure (also untrue), and more bro-science.
The

Thats the point, for Americans.
American population = 315 million
European population = 730 million
The majority of Americans is cut. The majority of Europeans is uncut. There are more Europeans. Therefore, being uncut is the de facto standard. Following out of this, Americans are weird, and if anything, there is a

Nice load of bullshit. Want a cup of 'stop perpetuating untrue myths' with that?

What bothers me about it is that it is one of the most intimate parts of my body, and some other people made a decision about it based on false facts and pseudo-psychology—all with no pressing reason to have it done. No medical issues whatsoever. My parents weren't even religious-minded about it. They just did it

One guy here who isn't happy about it, and I can tell you many more are like me. They're not going to tell you, a person without a penis, about their penile anxiety.

Wait, so, they shouldn't have found it fun to visit strippers?
'Hey bro, I went to the stripclub last night, got an awesome lapdance'
'Dude what the fuck.. thats something you should be grim about'
Please.. guys can't even have one single iota of fun and banter these days?

As someone also going through the process of becoming a cop, let me assure you - those 3 hour exams can be aced by anyone who passed the 4th grade. It's super annoying, but I think they design this months-long process to weed out anyone who doesn't really want to do this. This is also not the norm - I'm assuming

Actually, that is said often. The "I'm not blaming" disclaimer actually comes from the feminist assertion that to give advice is to blame a victim. They don't need to say "I'm not blaming him" because nobody has taken offense to advice given to men about how to avoid violent crime.

No, but his whereabouts, appearance,

Here's a tip- The same advice applies to men who hope to not get mugged. It's not sexist. Criminals are criminals and are looking to victimize whoever they can get away with victimizing. It's not sexist, it's not blaming people who were not prepared, it is simply advice to improve the odds of avoiding being targeted

The problem is this: the two pieces of advice seem on the surface to be similar: take steps to protect yourself. Which on the surface sounds reasonable right? The problem is that locking a door is a an easy one time thing that anyone can do and doesn't disrupt your day or plans. If you don't do it, that's kind of lazy

N....no. That's never been the argument. Way to strawman all over it. Good job.

The actual argument is that people do bad things. People steal. People murder. People commit genocide. People even rape. If you leave your door unlocked, you don't deserve to be burglarized. But locking your door helps prevent that from

These are not straw man arguments, but keep saying that, even though it doesn't mean what you think it means.

Uh, but most molestation cases involve someone known to the victim.

I'm just waiting for some troll to say if you don't lock your car or the door to your house and you get robbed that if your fault.

They've been taught for years not the hit women, taught that any retaliation or protection of themselves will seen as abuse toward her and that they are the bigger and stronger one so they should be able to take it.

I'm gonna get flamed for this, but this article seems excessive and downright mean-spirited. Dude seems relatively harmless, did Jezebel really need to go and get him fired?