So, you'd be fine with broader, more reinforced criticisms, then? If so, then awesome. I agree, nitpicking and complaining about "plot holes" (When 99% of the time, what they are describing isn't a plot hole) does no one any favors.
So, you'd be fine with broader, more reinforced criticisms, then? If so, then awesome. I agree, nitpicking and complaining about "plot holes" (When 99% of the time, what they are describing isn't a plot hole) does no one any favors.
I don't think you get it: It "fucking ruled" isn't an objective truth. The Dude would say: "That's like, your opinion, man". Criticize the pretentious navel gazing of the reviewer! Great! I do it all the time! But don't lump in your personal love for the episode as the proof that he's wrong.
Oooooh, I see. So because I didn't like this show, or where it's going, I must be some sort of bizarre obsessive theorist who think I can do a better job? Let me put that accusation to rest: I don't think I can do a better job, but I'm not a professional writer. And I don't need to be an engineer to complain when…
What?
But TV is more enjoyable when it's grounded is some level of believability. Not just a series of cliche'd set-ups so you can get to some super sweet moments.
Thank you! Yes, Beautiful fight, great cinematic: Utterly dumb.
So because the reviewer is a pretentious twat, that means no criticism can be made, huh? This was the best. thing. evar! You're entitled to your opinion, but so are other people. Why are you being so venemous about a TV show, for crying out loud?
With the right tactics, a smaller force can, and has, beat a larger force. You yourself admitted it happened in actual human history. Add in a freaking giant and the fact that this is make-believe, and it was a fine attempt. Just to bad all tactics fell out the window and it just devolved to, "Fuck it. CHAAAARGE"
Shields strong, spears ouchie. No break Torumund. Balls. Dicks. Sour Goat Milk.
By invading another country, and killing the people who lived in villages and on farmsteads so, you know, he could have them. The Visigoths were a nomadic group fleeing from a horrible force, but: Spoiler alert: When you take someone else's home by violence, you're an asshole.
Go to bed. You're overthinking things, like 1000%. You'd make a great modern English Lit prof, though.
If that's all you took away from this, I feel sorry for you. Also, you need to look up what nitpick means. My criticisms are broad and varied, like, the very opposite of what nitpicking is.
Oh, I see. Only say positive stuff or GTFO, huh? Screw other people's opinions! Who cares if they want to give constructive criticism, or voice what they thought didn't work for them!
Hiitchcockian!? How…. HOW?
Except that Dany isn't gay or bi, and even if she was, she has enough political acumen (and common sense) to know that two women can't produce an heir. You guys need to get your heads out of your butts.
Blackwater and the Battle for the Wall were amazing. You know why? Because 45 minutes of it wasn't spent sitting around talking about the battle that was to come.
You could have stopped at: "No character in television history has been as one-dimensional"
There a ton of flaws in this episode, and spoiler alert: People have different opinions then you. If your self worth is dependent on a letter grade some internet review gives a show you like, then you need some better self-respect, homie.
Ramsay was good at being everything. An expert tactician, an expert bowman, an expert sabateour and an expert leader! I mean, he was a unabashed sadistic treacherous asshole, yet he still managed to get most of the major Northern Houses to join him.
Good. The second this gongshow is over, the better. I don't think I can take 2 seasons of this terrible writing, let alone 5. D&D are floundering, at least dialogue-wise, without books to draw from.