It’s funny that Kellyanne Conway went off on a reporter from the Washington Examiner since it’s a well known right wing rag. You know things are tense when they are fighting with the right wing media.
God almighty, can you imagine if your fucking boss was like “Please don’t have sex other than with your spouse during the time we’re working on this project.” It’s like that whole “I can’t have sex because my coach says it will hurt my performance” bullshit.
So, that’s Rep Katie Porter, D-CA. This is only a snippet of the inquiry - there’s more to it than what’s in the video - but she’s referring to the horrifying accounts of what content monitors have to go through and how terribly they’re treated by FB. The point she’s making is that if he’s not willing to do it for…
hahahahahahaha and I’m sure that everyone he asked respected his wishes and never had sex again. sure. fuckin’ hell this dude needs to just shut the fuck up already.
The only thing I can hear coming out of his mouth is “I’m a real boy”.
I’ve seen a whole bunch of folks sharing AOC’s questions of him on social media claiming that she’s really sticking it to him, but it’s always nonsense like what you’re describing. One person I know was pointing out how ridiculous it was that he didn’t know the exact date that in interaction happened when AOC asked…
I actually waited for a review of She Said, but it's still nowhere to be found on Jezebel. Weird, right? Why review a book written by women and about women if you can bitch that a man didn't write this book instead?
Totally agree with you - the story published told the story of the women, this was the story of the lengths to which they went to kill the story. I’m not sure why she thought this would be something else. He already did the reporting.
It seems pretty clear to me that in the course of reporting the Weinstein story - which was presumably first a piece for NBC TV, which by necessity morphed into a print article when it moved to The New Yorker - a second story started to emerge. It’s literally in the title of this book, “Catch & Kill.” Killing Farrow’s…
Yeah I feel like his articles did an excellent job focusing on the victims so it’s not too surprising this would be more about him and his process.
Number one rule of book reviewing: Review the book in front of you, not the book you fantasize about reading.
This article is ridiculous. Farrow rails against powerful evil men hiding truth to service other powerful evil men and it doesn’t matter? If powerful evil men were not allowed to suppress news and the women who make claims against them, would life not in fact be better for women and other victims?
I mean... if you’re mad that A Man is getting credit, cover Kantor and Twohey themselves more on this site? They surely deserve it and I’d love to read the piece about their journey. If you’re mad that the victims aren’t centered, there are other pieces where they are. I’m not sure the existence of one book about the…
It is important to remember that Farrow’s sister, Dylan, wrote about the “grooming” and alleged abuse she suffered at the hands of her father, Woody Allen. In a piece for the Hollywood Reporter in 2016, Farrow lays bare his personal stake in the movement—his sister’s suffering—and it is this investment that led him…
I have not read this book. But it sounds from the review that this is just not the book on the matter that Megan wanted to read. I’m sure, however, it’s exactly the book that Farrow set out to write.
The book is about NBC killing the story and Farrow trying to get it published.
My husband worked for the FBI, dealing with missing persons cases. Three times in the five years, he had seen what he says looks like almost the same cat (a completely white cat, except for the black on it’s face) near locations where they’ve found the missing person. All in very different areas of the country though…
My story isn’t spooky or scary but it’s the closest thing I’ve ever experienced to the supernatural and I’ll never forget it.