While I agree with Sphincter that there is almost no chance that was printed unintentionally, the fact that the entire college paper editorial staff was OK with calling him this tells me that he probably deserved to be called that name.

can we all at least agree that the house plant would be more inteligent and productive, oxygen consumption/production aside?

WTF? That’s the only way to change your uber password?!.

Do you have a source? If those figures are truly based on charges being filed, and not even convictions, then that is so misleading!

Even if the designer wasn’t aware she was going to wear the dress, if an increase in demand puts your company out of business, there were some other bad decisions made along the way.

I just bought an Alienware 17 R4 with a i7 and GTX1080 with 16gb of RAM

No.

You won’t comprehend this, but it’s relevant because of the quotes I included in my last comment. Feel free to re-read all the comments up to this point so you can get on the same (web) page.

Is expecting billionaires to pay the same tax rate as someone making 50k really that greedy?

2004...the year eviscerated actually meant something and wasn’t only used for buzzfeed headlines.

I have no idea what that quote has to do with this conversation.

Let me catch you up here.

You are misinterpreting the Rodman quote. It is for context. Obviously, neither is to be taken as fact. Rodman, a known crazy man, only puts the number at 50%, therefore her 98% is even more ridiculous than it would look on it’s own.

At least the lyrics were on-point:

There’s several hundred players in the WNBA during her career, I don’t think it is likely she even knows the orientation of 98% of the league, let alone that 98% are gay.

I’m doing neither of those things. I know these players are paid garbage wages for the most part. And I know their jobs are grueling and prone to permanent injury.

Nobody’s equating those two things, but you.

So you’re saying she should keep her identity hidden (like “in the closet”, so to speak) because it’s not “required” for her to be vocal about her identity?

So you’re saying she should keep her identity hidden (like “in the closet”, so to speak) because it’s not “required” for her to be vocal about her identity?

It might be a failure of my imagination, but I can’t picture a likely scenario that would require her to be vocal about her heterosexuality.