I’m certainly no expert in civil law or any law in general, but if the judge allowed her video deposition, I feel like that is the judge saying this friend/coworkers opinion is worth considering in the outcome of the case. That is all.

I definitely got that your comments were directed at Lavergne, no worries about that, but I guess I am just seeing her testimony from a different perspective is all.

We are trying to make it simpler, not add 4 new levels of complexity to PI.

Seriously, at no point did I ever indicate anywhere that a sexual assault victim has to speak about to anyone they don’t want to about the incident. That is way waaaaay besides the point. How did you even get to that??

Where at? I’m southeast Wisconsin and there has been no appreciable change in quality over said timespan, in my experience, which is quite a lot since I moved within a mile from a Culvers several years ago.

This is the line you find most offensive in the whole article?

You don’t see how someone who is (what seems to be very likely in this case) falsely accusing someone of sexual assault for financial gain may negatively impact actual sexual assault victims?

Sploid is really the most useless gawker asset. Two sentences and embed a youtube clip.

they still have one more stock photo of that valut they need to use up so keep your eyes peeled to lifehacker posting a similar article in 2017.

But they told you not to Panic!

Yeah there’s clearly no link between IG followers and looks.......

yeah the colors are horrid. It looks like someone put their green eggs and ham into a blender and spilled it onto some graph paper.

You guys must not have Culvers that far west. You are missing out.

Making jokes on reddit about 50 year old movies is what we call a failure to communicate.

Normal people can differentiate between Donald the infant and Donald the insane shithead running for President your child.

Very interesting, yes I certainly saw those replies but it’s not surprising.

I don’t agree at all.

I agree but I think you’re shifting to a new conversation.

Thanks for sharing. It’s nice to hear there are others out there who have a similar definition of “happy” that involves minimal social interaction.

Ann O’Leary’s job is to get Clinton elected. I could argue that if she wasn’t considering how policies and decisions may impact the election, then she isn’t doing her job.