Apple says the data is sent to their servers anonymously and that the data inside your iPhone is not actually your tracking data - but nearby WiFi locations and towers. Read again. Not your data. But I'm sure that doesn't make a huge difference at all either?

Do you mean "your being" as in your physical being?

All in good fun. Especially when you consider that the South Park production team relies heavily on Apple software and hardware to produce each episode.

I know someone who uses their iPad for preview and remote trigger. So maybe she's one of those and just found a handy way to carry her iPad while her DSLR is elsewhere....

It was a completely different landscape at that time. Windows Mobile was one of the only mobile platforms out with a native API. Blackberry relied on Java and so did a handful of other mobile OS's.

Imagine the uproar that Apple would have caused if the iPad required the iPhone for some functionality.

Oxford and Webster (the only 2 dictionary's worth shit as far as I'm concerned) are both missing that definition of "Playbook".

You're both right. Kind of.

Just like they lost a lot of customers over not supporting Flash or removing the 3 1/2 floppy from the iMac?

Apple has a tiny minority stake in h.264. There are dozens and dozens of companies that hold larger stakes. There are actually Universities that have larger stakes in h.264 than Apple does.

Care to elaborate on how you relate those two things with an "interesting"?

"Right now There's no evidence of that at all—that's the good news."

Dave Chappelle did the same thing in a Tyrone the Crackhead skit on Comedy Central.

Law enforcement purposely withholds information from the public in order to make it easier to identify credible leads/information or suspects that come in.

Calm down. It's a brand. You mindless minion.

Noticed this a week or so ago while updating my Alert notifications.

Really? You're going to do exactly what with resolution over 1080p?

As long as the cameras are using CMOS sensors you will always get the "jell-o" effect. Nikon might possibly tackle this problem in the future but Canon probably won't....it will eat into their video camera sales.

I use Firefox, Safari and Chrome.

24fps was for cutting costs. The difference in $$$ is negligible now but since we have been brainwashed to equate 24fps with the "movie look" - you won't see it go away anytime soon.