Can the expression “the GOAT” please die?

We disagree on a lot but this is something we agree upon. The last thing this guy needs is the QueenBey stan army coming for him for the crime of not bowing in adulation and hanging on every word out of the queens mouth.

Why? The attitude in rothkopfs article is the exact reason why Clinton may lose.

So, to call back to another story on this site about what constitutes a bully, is Schumer the bully here? By the power-dynamic definition discussed there, Schumer was definitely the bully, because she used her power not only to shame this guy, but to send hordes of fans after him in attack mode.

Already <3 ing the people who were horrified at how horrible this was in the other thread who now are turning around and shrugging this guys experience off like it’s NBD. I’m sure it’s an intellectually consistent, principled stance.

Based on the commentariat around these parts and gawker probably not very far apart.

I think death threats and coming after your children counts as at least bullying. Roy may not be a good or smart person but no one deserves that. I guess we need a new word, if bullying and abuse won't do?

Uhhhh, no. Please, no. There’s this thing called “being the bigger person”. Also, this thing called “being rational and not calling for murder, even when the person is an idiot”. Sure, these guys suck, but a lot of people suck, we shouldn’t choose who lives and dies, especially when they do nothing illegal. Their…

Looking forward to Tina Fey saying “Hillary, you did it, c*nt!” next year!

What exactly is wrong with saying he wouldn’t marry a loud aggressive woman? I wouldn’t marry a man or woman with a loud aggressive personality.

Agree, agree, agree. I just wouldn’t try to convince one of my younger cousins of it. There would be no point.

I’ve been a grown woman for a long time and even I don’t remember the Kennedy years. Young women today do not relate to her or to her style.

Schumer is angry when a fan wants to take her picture without her consent so her response is to take his picture then shit shame him across the Internet. Was that supposed to be a “lesson” for all the little people?

Gawker has published nude pictures of several people without their consent and no one cares. But Schumer had to deal with a rude fan taking her picture and people are comparing it to rape.

Can we agree that both are creepy violations of privacy?

I thought we’d actually gotten past this using rape as a descriptor thing. Unless it’s actual rape, no you don’t get to use rape as a descriptor.

I agree this gay went too far, and is a ridiculous asshole... but camera lenses feel “male gazey” and “rapey”? To a woman who has done “scandalous” photoshoots for many magazines and being on camera is literally her livelihood? No thanks, for the rape pseudo-comparison.

I think most people are fine with it. Unfortunately, what you hear is the extremely vocal minority.

Abby was great, like the president she was originally supposed to be a very minor character but was too awesome to keep that way. Amy and Joey were both great, and Ainsley cut Sam down better than any other character. Nancy was steel, I thought her and John Amos were great in scenes together- though I always laugh…

THANK YOU.