And to those looking to cast a vote for Democrats, look at the SCOTUS nominee put forth by Obama who came down on the side of Guantanamo prison guards being permitted to search the genitals of detainees before they’d be allowed to see their lawyers.

That literally did not happen.

It’s not that weird. Mike was trying so hard to get that hockey job. Seems like the non-skills he developed would transfer over pretty easily.

Okay, but did you see the #HillaryMen falling over themselves to overcorrect and insist what happened was perfectly normal and that the line about overheating was absolutely true (until the campaign changed their story) and that they would’ve done the same thing if they were willing to go outside?

You don’t understand references to online.

What? I didn’t say anything like any of that.

It’s getting rebooted under the Young Animal imprint next month.

What?

He can thank them for what they did for Flint, which gets them and the issue new coverage on CNN, or he can fuck off.

That, and every time he alienates a group of people, Clinton does something to alienate a portion of a larger group of people. It all evens out!

No, your point is incorrect. The early ’90s were not a time when homophobia was “way past acceptable”. That’s simply not true. You haven’t even presented evidence to support this position. In the vast majority of the world, it’s either acceptable or enforced by law today.

What? Who said the art is trying to mimic anything? It’s not. This article doesn’t say that it is and it probably doesn’t say that because it would be incorrect. I don’t know where you’re getting this. What do you even think it is trying to mimic? On what basis do you hold that belief? The only source I can find for…

People use Messages? In 2016? Why?

I didn’t say that I think that, no. I have no idea where you’re getting that.

What genre do you think they were working in?

What would you guess would be the demographic of the creators and readers of this comic based on this article? Or did you not read it? Where is your criticism of this work even coming from?

Ha ha, you don’t think race matters in a discussion about the content of Real Deal Comix.

You clearly misunderstood what I said. I’ll reword it for you using the words that were actually used in the thread at the point I asked what I asked. Hopefully, that will make it more clear!

You understand the white guy is the bad guy in that image, right? That this comic was by a couple of black guys in post-King riots Los Angeles? That the primary protagonist of the series is one of those, as you put it, “black ‘thugs’”?

The comment you replied to was exclusively about this subject. You changed the subject without telling anyone. Don’t be surprised when people respond as if you hadn’t.