What you’re describing isn’t liberalism, it’s libertarianism.

Somehow, I don’t think pointing out that their position isn’t scientific isn’t going to influence these people in any way.

The Democrats’ chosen candidate for the presidency is okay with legal restrictions on abortion access, so it’s probably 50/50 at this point.

It’d only be gangster if they spelled it EFIL4STARCOMED.

You say “their positions make a whole lot of sense”, but that “they shouldn’t have any voice in policy when it comes to reproductive rights”. Okay!

Clinton thinks you can be a pro-life feminist. No wonder these clowns stick with the Democrats.

Makes me think of eugenics, but maybe that’s just because that kind of talk is usually reserved for “solving” the “problem” of disabled people not being aborted.

Who said anything about Bill Clinton?

“dangerous people”

And Clinton still defends it. Weird.

I’d like to know why you think I have anything to do with this article and why you think my name is Julianne.

So what you’re saying is that she’s not, in fact, a true Scotsman?

It’s interesting your source on Stein having “terrible, terrible vaccination views” cites a source (from four years ago!) just says that your employer shouldn’t get to choose, based on religious opposition, that you shouldn’t be permitted to have vaccinations. What’s terrible about that position? Do you think Hobby…

If you believe that an opinion being popular doesn’t make it right, why do you keep referring to how popular an opinion is in order to justify it being acceptable? I don’t care that a majority of Democrats are unwilling to take a principled stand. Restrictions on abortion access based on timing or age and attempts to…

Do you believe an opinion being popular makes it right?

What’s “good” about restrictions on certain types of abortion, parental consent requirements, and so-called informed consent? There’s a reason NARAL gave his state an F when he was in charge.

Given his stated positions and the bills he has signed into law and the 100% ratings he has received, it’s clear the ratings are either effectively meaningless or do not at all address the issues we’re discussing. Digging for them seems like a worse use of your time than digging for what he actually believes and what…

Laws of that nature have been enacted on his watch. His state got a failing grade from NARAL while he was in office. Do you think things like that matter, or are you willing to dismiss it based on these 100% scores? Clinton and Kaine have both expressed willingness to curb access to abortion in certain cases and…

Do you think restrictions on certain types of abortion, parental consent requirements, and so-called “informed consent” laws are a danger to abortion rights? Are you only concerned with, as you put it, women’s abortion rights, and not abortion rights for all?

Why do you think they do that, given his track record?