I mean, it’s only one thing among many that’s indicative of the way he views prisoners’ rights, but that he came down on the side of the government when they were arguing they should be allowed to search the dicks of Guantanamo detainees before they’re allowed to see their lawyers, one of whom described it as “a…

Maybe not “our” rights, but if she lets Garland’s nomination stand, the rights of lots of other people will be trampled all to hell.

Do you really want to use the phrase “final solution”? Do you understand what that evokes?

No, I never said anything about Clinton supporters actually voting for McCain. What I said was that “so many Clinton supporters were saying [emphasis added] they’d vote for” McCain. You can actually scroll up and see for yourself or just click the link in this comment to my original one. Perhaps you confused me with…

Nobody said they did vote for McCain. You’re now arguing (“20% of Clinton supporters did NOT vote for McCain”) against a claim that wasn’t made, whereas before you were arguing (“no Clinton supporter said that”) against a claim that was made that was actually correct.

That’s a very good question! But it’s secondary to the point because I was responding to the claim that “they didn’t” like those ideas. They very much do! Single payer healthcare and affordable education are, while less popular than any sensible person would think they should be, very popular. The idea that Sanders…

What? Lots of Clinton supporters said that they’d vote for McCain. Do you simply not remember what was said in 2008?

So you don’t know what autism is. Okay!

Or that the presumed nominee all along insisted that these things are “impossible” when they are not, thus crushing their hope for a future where they can have basic things that other countries have. Again, Democrats wanted these things to come to pass. Then they were told they can’t have them and they listened.

That so many Clinton supporters were saying they’d vote for a ticket that had Sarah Palin’s name on it shows that they didn’t have a shred of sanity.

I like how they asked how much people would be willing to pay in taxes without asking how much they already pay for private health insurance and for student loans. That totally paints a full picture of what such a change would involve! Do you think the results would have been different if the pollsters pointed out to…

There were more PUMAs in 2008 than Bernie or Bust people in 2016.

Okay, but more people (including more than 7 out of 10 Democrats!) actually want what Sanders wants on those issues. If, as people insist, Clinton is pragmatic and bending to the will of popular opinion is always a good thing, she should change her tune on those issues.

When you look at the consequences of doing so, rejecting universal healthcare and education isn’t anything close to a pragmatic decision.

Oh no, a boycott!

Again, there’s no such thing. No one has it.

And here comes the ableism!

This may shock you to learn, but I don’t really care what someone like you thinks of me.

Yeah, unfortunately, most of us don’t do exciting things like make false assumptions about the racial makeup of other people’s cities.

I’ll do you one better! I note how you glossed over the entirety of my comment.