The single best thing WWE could do with their video games is acknowledge that wrestling is fake. That they still present the matches as competitive rather than cooperative is ridiculous.
The single best thing WWE could do with their video games is acknowledge that wrestling is fake. That they still present the matches as competitive rather than cooperative is ridiculous.
Nobody knows what TNA is.
How many times do I need to have someone explain to me that they think she’s great by saying she’s better than Trump before someone realizes that that doesn’t mean anything? Being better than worst is not enough to qualify someone as great.
I’m not suggesting anyone only vote for a perfect candidate.
Accepting Democrats doing things that are wrong because they’re not more wrong than Republicans is exactly why Democrats get candidates who do things that are wrong. They face no consequences.
Again, auditors are not tasked with enforcing rules. And where are you getting that they knew about this before this particular audit? Which previous audit did they conduct that discovered what happened in the past?
I don’t care if she can be prosecuted. It’s pretty relevant that someone who wants to be in charge of the entire executive branch knowingly broke a rule of procedure. I don’t care about Republicans’ obsessions. Her presidential aspirations should be destroyed! She’s a bad candidate!
It’s not just that she’s wanted to be president for years, it’s that she’s expected to be president for years, so she figured breaking a rule here or there wouldn’t get in her way.
That’s not how auditing works. Auditors don’t enforce rules and don’t act preemptively.
Something being legal and it having been done before doesn’t make doing it right.
Losers infiltrating the State Department’s auditing staff just to oppress women and get free college educations. Sad!
It’s almost as if auditors can only find violations of the rules after they’ve occurred!
No, he’s not. Perhaps you’re confusing him with Craig Ferguson?
Yes, and there was no such thing as a Yahoo search engine for another two years after that.
You really don’t know what burden of proof means, do you?
It was popular and influential and it wasn’t a search engine untl 2002.
It matters if they were great because that’s what the subject at hand is.
You like Yahoo and fantasy sports and Deadpool and I’m not sure why the townsfolk haven’t yet stormed your gates with torches and pitchforks.
No. So, again, how would you react if someone said that about you? Would you dispute it?
Sure a lot of people here who think you were saying Yahoo was great and necessary.