@to do everything in truth: It um.... doesn't actually send a message that small breasts are bad, or that men who find small breasts attractive are perverts. It has nothing to do with men telling women they look wrong.

@murasaki: The point, you are missing it. It is about people appearing to be children. Breasts are just one way to determine it, but not the only way. It isn't saying anyone with big boobs is ok, it's saying that some women with small ones may appear to be children— and some children may be used in porn with the…

@NOlita89: It is about context. People are simplifying it. It's about showing images that appear to be of children. Breast size is, unfortunately, an easy tool to use, even though it is both over and under inclusive.

@laurascr: give her a chance. It might not mean she's a bad person, just misinformed/honestly believes there are bebbes at stake. Especially if you're both still in college!

As someone who was both bullied, and had a suicide attempt at age 14... I'm on the side of the worstie, here.

It took me too long to get the joke— which is their fail number 1— and you can't even see the damn spear— which is fail number 2.

@Dictator for Life: Except the people who don't like abortion think you're killing babies. So the comparison to slavery, at least, does work. I think they're wrong, but until you realize that's where they are coming from, there can be no real discussion towards changing their attititudes.

@lizbang: Walking slowly doesn't automatically equal hobble. I can't walk super fast in heels, but I like them, and do find them fairly comfortable. Reminding guys that its toolish to outpace me is not a bad thing.

@moonlitsapphire: Well, we don't know if she actually had sex with the father, or if they had threesomes or anything so, eh.

@Ginmar Rienne: Sometimes yes, sometimes no. But since he was living with the woman he cheated on, that does certainly up the chances.

@Sev: It isn't rhetoric, it's what they genuinely believe. And we will never be able to combat their thoughts until we are able to combat that specific thought process. Seriously. Most anti-choicers I know are not in it to control or demonic women, they're in it bc they see it as equal to infanticide. For real. …

@lalaland13: It's seen as noble by the people who believe non-Christians are going to spend eternity in a fiery hell of torture. So basically, they're trying to honestly help you, they're just fucked up in what they think you need.

@girlscoutcookie deserves her orgasms, dammit: Ahem. I am in law school. No one has siblings or kids of girl scout age, and I want my damn cookies!!

I imagine these as the flight attendant uniforms for Virgin Atlantic.

@BytheSea: I actually know quite a few people above average intelligence who are Republicans. But then I know a lot of lawyers and law students, as well as a handful of Republican doctors.

The second to the last one? I can plz haz as wedding dress, complete with the gloves? The one that's all white though— ugh, the neckline looks like another gloved arm is just chilling out.

@PilgrimSoul: Yeah, I'm on team Bichard is making sense and Flood is not. (Because clearly everything has to be a team these days, right?) And I do think that mothering— and fathering— have large effects on the types of people we develop into.

Or, it could just mean that guys who are more into mistreating women are also the ones who are more likely to watch porn, when it's available. correlation =/= causation in this case, or there would probably be only 1 decent guy in 100.

@AlmostDream: My flow alternates, and when its light, i just wear some heavy duty underwear that's already been stained. So I could see forgetting I had one in, if the string disappeared and there was still... flow.

@curiousgeorgiana: Oh yes. I got splattered with oil one day when I was wearing a pair of very short shorts— just imagining the burned area extending to where the oil hit first is enough to make me super glad for clothing.