imtakingaridewithmybestfriend
imtakingaridewithmybestfriend
imtakingaridewithmybestfriend

I know this is Ms. "respect yoself fux his chores" writing here but that's not what "outlier" means...

Also Sonia Delaunay-Terk though not part of the group had some significant contact through Schwitters and Ball...wow. That's a disgrace, that that's the listing for Höch. Wow. Hard to believe that 30 years after Nochlin this is still happening... thanks for your very illuminating answer and all the research.

What Dadaists were you guys talking about, just out of curiosity?

I know I'm always "that person" but how is Westminster an analogue to the Holy Grail? Especially "literally"?

Always the best comments. Always.

I think that is what I'm saying...that they enjoy the degradation of women. Rather they enjoy the feeling of superiority, with a dose of getting off, at least intellectually such as it is, on subjugation. If you look at the over-the-top prose devoted to Janet Mock, for example ("the absolutely incredible writer, trans

Yes, you're right. The unconcealed jealousy over the personalities associated with Girls and toward Dunham in particular that comes out as almost calls for violence on Jezebel is disgusting. I would posit an alternative hypothesis, that the writers praise Knox precisely because she is a woman who could be attractive

That's not what the headline on the story is about. Banks could've not signed the autographs and just walked straight into the theatre. In fact she could have entered the theatre covertly. The point is that she made a gesture still considered obscene – in fact it is actually against the law in Germany to flip someone

Gelkan is pointing out what some people including myself frequently point out here, that Jezebel has vague and arbitrary standards about who it criticises and for what and ideas about "empowerment" that run counter to the actual best interests of women, i.e. the canonisation of Belle Knox.

They've counteracted any criticality inherent in the post by being SO COOL and using the word "pussy" in the headline.

Jezebel in a nutshell, reppin' for the Millennial Ugly American Crew.

I've gotta say I love to see that a publication has a clear editorial policy and now a new plank in the platform beyond "BELLE KNOX/bell hooks GOOD RAWRR" is emerging: the "double down" manoeuvre.

Yeah, that's real progress for women.

I've actually never heard anyone but myself say the word nepotrixen, but I've said it numerous times and it even appears in some stuff I've published so...it's not a gendered term (though being German and being that it's my word, I'm applying the rules of our nouns to it), it's the subject that is needed in the

You understand the campaign is to ban the word bossy, right, not the idea of children aspiring to be in charge? I don't have a problem with demonstrating with some force than men need to behave better in white-collar workplaces, because that's where most of the doucheness begins. I have a problem with Sandberg, who

I agree the issue is an important one. In the reverse of the normal modality, my complaint is actually the messenger. .

I see what you are saying. But then you can write this column, or I can, or, for example, a woman economist, stock broker, "consultant," whatever. Sandberg is the ultimate nepotrixen (and the co-author who I suspect is the actual author a connected white dude), so this type of "reporting" rings false, since its

The sentiment in the post is of course valid and thoughtfully stated.

What are people doing wearing fur in 2015? WTF.

Me too. It is very upsetting and I can tell just knowing these types of people are people I have blithely interacted with is making me sick. I'm looking at how to globally edit (to the point of deleting) my comments history too... but, yeah, this is it for me. I'm sorry this has been so upsetting but we needed to