telling him to get back in his truck and kill himself, even though he told her that he was rethinking his decision.

Luckily, you weren’t on the jury.

This is less surprising then finding a Confederate Flag in Stephen Miller’s bedroom.

I think this has a lot to do with it.

Not just celebrities. If we only looked at paintings, read books and listened to classical music from individuals we’d want in our house, we could go through all that was left in a weekend, if we took our time. Doubtless this would be true of the notables in most fields.

I would say Beyonce is a good example. Everyone love’s Bea. But Bea love’s a man that is pretty much trash. So, ya’ll better keep makin excuses why Jigga is a good person. Everyone makes excuses and exemptions for who and what they love.

Because enjoying a celebrity’s output, more often than not, means compartmentalizing it and enjoying the output separate from the person who created it. Most celebrities are shitbags.

Then stop watching the show

The executives allowed it, actors usually don’t have power to do anything about it. I believe some of the actors did not have any scenes with him. He was also on Real Husbands of Hollywood last season, it seemed like his PR was cashing in all their favors to get him on air. Industry players have invested a lot in him,…

Well, drugging and raping people is pretty high up on most people’s list of violent crimes, and I imagine hardly anybody out there still thinks Bill Cosby is innocent. As for R. Kelly, I don’t even quite understand what he’s being accused of - brainwashing groupies to live in a cult or something?

Real Talk: Why won’t WOMEN turn their back on the powerful performing men of entertainment?

That’s Charlie Hustle for you. So much dedication to the game, he’d play ball even without any grass on the field.

I wouldn’t personally vote for a pro-life candidate either. But if the only way a Dem can get elected in Salt Lake City is to be pro-life, I have no issue with the DNC funding that candidate.

You cannot pass legislation if you aren’t elected. Better to get half of what we want, even 10% of what we want, than none of it.

I agree with you, but to be fair, anytime Democrats have had a majority, it has been in part because of conservative Democrats. However, I think abortion rights are a fair place to draw the line, especially considering personally against, politically pro-choice Dems (Landrieu, Heitkamp, Casey) have had success in…

Candidates from more conservative districts can be more conservative. That would be reflective of their district. If during the campaign the emphasis needs to be on issues of more relevance to that community so be it.

I know. I’m working through it as best I can, too. It’s become so thorny because we’re facing the reality of having a complete moron in office, and it seems like the most important thing is to get him out and not follow up with more incompetent lunatics. So you really have to consider what you’ll give up (as a party…

This seems fair. I’m trying really hard to think through this one out loud. There’s such a wide gulf between “single issue vote” and “why the fuck is this even an option.”

From a pragmatic standpoint, it sucks and is awful but we may well be living in an era of “everyone else vs. them.”

Because of a single issue? I think that’s being short-sighted. If you have to agree with every single issue or not be a Democrat, that’s going to limit your candidates. How about gun control? Would a pro Second Amendment Democrat be ok, or are you going to throw away that candidate too? How about a Democrat who…