Glad to see you made a profile, Milo.
Glad to see you made a profile, Milo.
There was a piece on that yesterday. Do keep up.
appear to be relatively the run-of-the-mill “free speech” schlock
Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout.
Am I the only one reading this:
Based on your one comment you’re a painter without a canvas, paint, or a studio who thinks art is for losers.
He doesn’t have one, but keep an eye out for his weekly NYT opinion piece, and stay tuned for his regular appearances as a commentator on the Jake Tapper show. It’s just a matter of time.
At what time slot will I find his cable access show?
Watching a horrible person’s ignoble spiral into nothingness is fun.
Because this is objectively hilarious.
Could not agree more. LOTS of people in the comments here taking pages straight from the Republican playbook. I worry that liberals feel the only way to beat Republicans is to act like them.
What does that accomplish? You’re not going to chance Bret’s mind, you’re not going to change his followers minds. All you’re doing is making yourself feel better. That’s not an accomplishment.
Samer got emotional and embarrassed himself in this exchange and I can’t see it any other way.
Really. I can’t stand Stephens either, but he definitely came off as the adult in the room here, an adult patiently but gently swatting away spam-children.... This exchange was so embarrassing for Samer, or at least, I felt embarrassed for him because he doesn’t seem to have the sense to do it himself.
“The one historical figure I know is Neville Chamberlain, so if I mention him ad nauseam, people will think I’m intelligent. I enjoy shitting my pants, because then other people have to smell it and it lets me know I’m better than them when they recoil in disgust.” - ArtistAtLarge, a colossal fuckwit
Yeah, it’s like Samer is saying: “Look, I got Stephenson to say some dumb, smug bullshit, and all I had to do was sacrifice my credibility as as journalist.”
So you’re saying that Samer willingly sacrificed his own credibility to damage Stephenson’s?
This should have been a Dead Letters entry.
Wait wait wait waaaaiiiiiit a minute. Two things of import are glossed over here:
So Stephens took the high road and you wrote a bunch of emails that look like they could have been written by an angry 12 year-old, and you actually think that by writing this and copying those emails and publishing them, we’re going to take your side?