imnotverybrightbecauseireadandbelievethingsongawkerbut
ImNotVeryBrightBecauseIReadAndBelieveThingsOnGawkerBut
imnotverybrightbecauseireadandbelievethingsongawkerbut

The irony is sooooooo thick in the TL:DR post written by resident waterboy, Gump Draper.

Remember when you guys...what am i thinking; you all have never “been.” lolololololol

Was actually over two weeks, but hey, he’s white and successful, so fuck him, right?

^^^Point proven, racist.

Yeah, if you’re a racist that can’t extrapolate any other meaning for that...you know, like he’s an all-star, and he played for the head coach in question...you know, the definition of familiar.

Reading Deadspin has to be the biggest in my book. I’m ashamed.

Jesus, you all are just offended by EVERYTHING these days. Even more things than I predicted you would; you’re offended by Bobby Bowden’s age and race. Fucking hell.

Umm...stupid, he’s right. Clearly none of you not only aren’t children from single parent homes, don’t know many people from single parent homes, nor any black people in general, you lily-white upper-middle class nothings.

Yeah, FUCK his clearly intolerant religious ideals that we all surmised by making a solitary, innocuous three-word comment!! SHAMESHAMESHAAAAAAME.

How about “I want to be able to make an innocuous judgement without being assaulted verbally and physically by small-minded, confused, overly-emotional children.”

Again, proving their point. You couldn’t even internalize/contextualize their well thought out and reasonable point without IMMEDIATELY calling them names. Oh, you kewt little children XOXO

LOLOLOL, you allllll are proving their lucid, respectable points. Keep it up!

He won’t. He’s an unpaid 20-something blogger with no life experience. You’re wasting your time (he’d probably agree with the latter sentiment)

BAHAHAHAHA, YOU called someone an idiot...

Goddman, Hamilton! You’re not trying hard enough! You need to throw more ad hominem in here to both deflect from the woefully inadequate vernacular AND factual revisionism (I use that term more loosely than you use polysyllabic words incorrectly, you kewt little snowflake).

Because they’re doing something? Something in response to an incident in which you have no facts, details, evidence (anecdotal nor otherwise), yet you made a clear judgement of which side you’re going to sit on, then invariably run away indefensibly in the event that you’re wrong, then blame the “process” rather than

Yes, academic institutions, what with their clear understanding of how the real world works, and their impenetrably sterling track records of “getting it right” (Duke, Virginia, ALMOST EVERY OTHER CASE, etc.) are absolutely the hands in which I’d want to leave my son or daughter’s future and freedom. Not, you know,

Reads like you don’t understand economics period, to make such a wildly baseless and ill-informed assumption. But you do support Gawker, so par for the course, you little kewtie!

That’s not at ALL what he’s saying, you rube. Because you seemingly have (extreme) difficulty contextualizing...well, everything, you should probably do a little more listening, and a (HELL) of a lot less opining. You’re terrible at it. I mean, you took the side of an irrational twitter-mob SENTENCES after insinuating

Yikes, you sound like a terrible coach (and likely a consistently losing one, given your clearly delicate, squeamish stomach for the innocuous [and poor choice in friends]). But feelings trump winning and losing, right? I mean, when you’re teaching young men about the world (the REAL world) through sport, correct?