uh... good for you?

I know there will be a lot of naysayers, but I feel like this might be a good compromise for someone that does a lot of stop and go commuting but still wants something that’s a bit more ”fun” and can’t afford to have a commuter car with an auto and a fun car with a traditional manual transmission.

Then you haven’t experienced one yet, they are awesome SUV’s, though getting a bit old now.

So how long before we start to see rear sliding doors on SUVs, or traditional rear doors on a minivan?

Even those aren’t “known” or “serious” issues. One person having a defect isn’t indicative of all of them having that issue. A lot of those problems were just that, 1 person had a problem, its posted on the list for items to look for.… it’s really blown way out of proportion. Now, if it was something that nearly ever…

To be fair, this is the digital age, and with online forums and facebook groups for everything, you’re not going to find a car out there that doesn’t have followers and lists of items to check for that are seemingly issues from the factory. But if the problems people are having are simple relatively harmless and…

A revised version? I didn’t realize the current version ever even was on dealer lots yet..... I live in an area where I pretty much get to see everything on the road at some point and usually pretty much as soon as they come out, and I’ve yet to see one of these on the road.

I disagree, the number of people that own and stream a game does not impact anyone’s enjoyment of that game either. Perhaps it’s a bad analogy. Regardless i still stand by the original poster and agree that just because something isn’t as successful as something else, that it makes it a failure, it doesn’t matter if…

This exactly. Too many people fall for the fanboyism and forget exactly this. By this logic, there would be 1 vehicle on the road, since all 285,345,345 models weren’t number 1, why bother offering them? Something can be less successful than something else and still make a pile of money and be, well.... successful.…

Oddly, that was one of the things I loved about my 2015 Buick Regal GS, though living in a more rural and dimly lit area may make a difference, but I like the extra light that is shining when unlocking the car in the dark.

Reminds me of the Muskrat, which I just so happen to know the location of if anyone should want to see it in person (and if you do, what the hell is wrong with you?).

I’m well aware, every vehicle I’ve owned has had them in the middle, I was saying I had never seen one that didn’t until recently.

I didn’t even know middle seats didn’t have latch system until I test drove an outback a couple weeks ago.... And you’re right, it’s a system that surely gets misused regularly.

Exactly this, apparently not enough people pay attention to the instructions that came with their cars and car seats. Latch systems definitely are only good up to certain weights, after that you “HAVE” to use the seatbelts as the LATCH system is only designed to work up to certain weights. Generally, most kids should…

“Foot traffic has decreased in dealers for obvious reasons, but that hasnt stopped car buying.“

But wouldn’t that be a later stage when the car is more final, not some early prototype….?

It could quite possibly be normal. I mean they are probably building them to test all over the world in all kinds of configurations, so it might actually be normal. I wonder if some of these may have had things that never came to fruition, like a manual...

“GM built over 100 of the things...”

I don’t know, I feel like a lot of it is because car companies want to appeal to what they think will sell better, and they seem to think everyone wants something that looks rugged and has plastic cladding and mimics an Outback or some of other CUV. I think if they made a decent wagon without the lift/plastic cladding…

How many times can someone punch my seat before I can legally punch them in the face?