Ah, a fine reference to a fine episode of Star Trek.

I find the critiques of this show fascinating:

Then why are 3 women featured?

but no female nipples so we can keep this SFW because female nipples are different from male nipples somehow.

YOU are trying to shit in my coffee.

“Given that Charlie’s family is so impoverished, I’m actually not surprised to hear this. Most of the children in the book fit a stereotype of the time, and a black Charlie would’ve fit with a lot of images of black American children.”

Where does it say this black kid he proposed was supposed to be American?

Can I get paid to write for you guys? I can surely come up with better articles.

“Game has powerful women in it” is something that I both applaud for happening and am sad that it’s rare enough we still need to write articles about it. :(

I think my primary problem with Life is Strange came down to just how archetypal its primary characters were.

It wasn’t that the game was poorly executed—because it was excellent in that regard.

It wasn’t that the narrative itself was bad; it was predictable, but a great many enjoyable stories are predictable.

...it was…

I mean I’ll watch Killjoys if I’m caught up on all my other shows and nothing else is on, but... Dark Matter is so consistently better.

“Even though I felt zero desire for him, it ultimately seemed less taxing to get drunk and let him have his way with me later that night.

My middle school students are just getting into it. They were blown away when I told them the math is often ‘real’.

Again, I’m being nitpicky, but “tend to be” is not the same as “they are.” I mean, biologically most men tend to be different from women, but I don’t feel right saying that “men are innately different from women.” And yes, biology exists for a reason, but nowadays the society is learning more about how much of the…

I think it is learned from society and culture. You can disagree, it’s fine. But now people who have been telling me on this thread that princessandthepea11 “is not arguing that it is inherent” can see here that she IS arguing it is inherent.

I thought that the comments were for discussion. I don’t see why I should never speak up about something I personally think is problematic just because I’m a survivor too.

Dude, it’s really shitty of you to wrap up anyone who tries to discuss something as MRA. I don’t need to agree with everything everyone says just because it’s a sensitive topic. If you can’t have a logical answer, then the least you can do is to be mature.

I’m saying that I see that, and I agree with you that it is a fact. We agree here. But I’m merely pointing out the danger in your generalization.

Furthermore, the reasoning is problematic because you seem to think that women CANNOT be as violent at all. So, when you see female murderers, like Casey Anthony, do you just label them as “not woman?” How can you not see that it is problematic to think that way / use biological essentialism in that way?

1) Have you ever heard about Scythians and the female warriors, also known to have inspired Amazonian women tales? Also, there have been queens throughout history who have been absolutely as violent as male rulers. Mary I of England, anyone? So you either don’t know history very well, or you don’t know how patriarchy…