imalwaysright2
Im Always Right
imalwaysright2

Go fuck yourself. 

Actually I see more versas than you might think. I fucking hate them

What really blows my mind is the folks that simultaneously:

...Lambo? Ferrari? Really? You’ll pass because they don’t touch those engineered parts, engines, etc? Seems juvenile.

I’ll never understand people who don’t get that. Plus, they are doing these kits on Ferrari’s, Lamborghini’s etc...they really don’t need more go.

They make body kits.........nothing is stopping you from dropping your car off at a tuner after or before.

They’re a high-end body shop, essentially.

It’s not really like a few bolt on performance upgrades are going to make a super car much faster and better handling than it started out. I would say they are just as likely to hurt performance if they try to “upgrade” it. In this case, it’s probably smart to leave them stock.

It takes a certain kind of crazy to grab an angle grinder and go to town on a Lamborghini. I like that kind of crazy.

Everything but the bolts. I want that look just minus the bolt on after market look. Make it look like it has actually part of the car and not some afterthought.

I’m over it. You can be wrong all day. Doesn’t mean anything to me. Just the chuckle I get from seeing uppity people like you crying when things don’t match your definition.

Do you take cars to show them off? Do you go to look at cars being shown?

The laziest art car I’ve ever seen.

i’m not sure what i’m supposed to be looking at with the 6.

This thing is perfect! Those wheels, man.

Bridge cars are inherently interesting

No...Opel is bringing us a wagon.

The last wave of GM’s large FWD V8-powered cars was particularly interesting. The Lucerne Super and DTS, with their 4.6-liter Northstar V8 and shared platform, handled reasonably, although torque-steer was still the order of the day. Of the W-Bodies, the 5.3-liter equipped LaCrosse Super and Grand Prix GXP performed

Are you a Confederate economic apologist? Who claims it was about states rights and protecting the southern economy? Which was supported by the oppressive enslavement of human beings? What narrative or perspective that actually matters am I leaving out? Southerners who didn’t have slaves? They had it pretty good

You missed my point.