imakeokaybeans
imakeokaybeans
imakeokaybeans

Which is hilariously misguided, because Assange is not a journalist. Assange is a L337 H4CK3R K1D who ran a document dump and accidentally became famous as a result.

Well, they also admire a certain rapist that was arrested today. 

I think a lot of this is just Paul being an idiot who admires a criminal.

Why is the Times acknowledgement that when Chelsea was convicted, it was prior to her transition, when she was known as Bradley - “wrong”? The transition does not erase the history of who she was prior, it simply corrects her to who she is. But when you look at legal records, they will not be edited to reflect the

Hmmmm, it appears that your headline is wrong because I actually can support a free press while also supporting the arrest of Julian Assange. As your own website notes, he was working with Manning to actively crack passwords and subvert security to gain access to sensitive documents. This is blatantly illegal and

They never covered the fact that his campaign paid a supposedly independent journalist to work on the campaign’s behalf or his failures to meet up to Splinter’s shibboleths on packing the Supreme Court or the filibuster either.

It’s not just tone deaf. It is a fundamental demonstration of hypocrisy (mind you, I don’t care about anybody’s hypocrisy). He used his platform as a representative of the people of Vermont to enrich himself. I don’t necessarily fault him for it, but if you’re a populist—especially a socialist populist, the notion

Weird there’s no news on Splinter about the Bernie Bros favorite rapist Julian Assange being arrested.

I’d like to see them report and provide commentary instead of the weak combination of hyperventilating and holier-than-thou bullshit that shows up here most of the time.

Splinter’s idea of news coverage is a twitter grifter/attention slurping toad typing in all caps and shouting WHITE NATIONALIST/UR A NAZI/BERNIE IS DADDY without doing any actual reporting.

Nowhere on the bill are you charged one ounce of decency or manners, yet you don't call your server a cunt, right? So that's clearly not true. 

It always befuddles me how a certain set of people will always look at the worker as the problem? I don’t go out to eat so that I can do a manager’s job for them and judge/rate/pay their staff. I do it for the food and the company of whomever I’ve decided to go eat with. Maybe if I’m doing the equivalent of employee

Of course US tipping culture sucks, but it’s what’s in place right now, and not participating in it isn’t an interesting intellectual exercise or protest, it just makes you look like a prick.

Pay. People. For. Their. Labor.

Morality and legality are two separate things. Are you really an adult in 2019 and don’t understand this? Apologies if you’re actually 14.

If you can’t afford to tip 20% then you can’t afford to eat out.

I was a server for years and I can say with confidence that this opinion is nothing more than justification to short people who do a job that, at the end of the day, even with tips, still doesn’t earn them enough when you consider how difficult the job is.

Virtually all American servers make below minimum wage, so the rest of your bullshit comment is completely irrelevant.