He likely didn’t want you to figure out it sucked.

*Googles “Lily Pulitzer bag”*

Goddamn autocorrect. MUSCLE car, not musical.

Tell me more about this musical car

You’re understating the controversy somewhat. Not only did the entire production team quit in support of the director, the voice cast quit too.

I see a profitable visual novel in your future! It worked with pigeons right?!

Yes but publish it as a Manga! Maybe with a spinoff dating game where you date the dogs!

So if I’m understanding everyone in the thread correctly, you’re saying DO publish the fanfiction I wrote when I was ten, but EVERYONE should be a dog? If this is the plan we’re going with, I’m going to need an agent

it’s already pretty stupid that they get to make profit off user videos as it is. They’re the only ones doing this. It’s stupid.

Another possibility is someone deciding to switch games mid-stream or playing licensed music (both of which are fairly common practices while streaming). Considering if your whole channel is partnered, and they automatically claim/monetize all of your videos and streams, claiming one of those could lead to problems…

I’m not militantly opposed to Nintendo, just when I see Nintendo do something stupid and get blindly defended by fanboys.

So basically do what everyone does anyways and Livestream Nintendo content on Twitch?

It would very much be cool to have maps like these of Darksiders 2. That game drew heavily from this game and you could really tell in some of the dungeons. You even get to ride a horse and fight a mirror version of yourself (well kinda).

So continues the odd tradition of great games and new entries (they’re bringing back warhammer fantasy roleplay!), into what is effectively a dead world lore wise.

Both when I played it and now, I feel like the level where you sneak inside Hyrule Castle is a bit of a letdown.

As a software developer focused primarily on UI, I absolutely love it. I think it should be something that Nintendo should go as far as enforcing the consistency. It goes a long way.

The ‘art only’ side clearly states they were against any medical regulation of the practice. And I do not see any statement from that side that there are any legitimate health concerns.

An interesting article as usual. For a quick update: though we have no big landmark cases or the like, tattooing in Taiwan....is still roughly as taboo as it was a year ago when I last typed about the subject. Though there is probably at least a slightly improvement in social awareness and acceptability of tattoo…

Which side is “pretending that there are not health risks from tattoos”?  

Just so everyone here knows what you’re citing, “The Truth About Cancer” is of the opinion that chemotherapy doesn’t treat cancer, but apricot pits and detoxing do.