ilikeneogeo
SamSho64
ilikeneogeo

Doubt it. My brother is one of the guys that does these things (his worked has been featured in calendars, for instance). You'd be surprised by what can be done with LEGO bricks that looks impossible to untrained unskilled eyes.

I know this is Gizmodo and not the NYT, but still... two typos in a single paragraph?

Wait, wait, wait... whether you realize it or not, you SHOULD be offended by it, because it's not real, and that—on principle alone—IS enough. The reason is because if you give an inch, companies will take a mile. Look, we're already getting basically fake steering (electric), fake transmissions (CVT), and even fake

No, Emanresu is right. That overhang is aweful... looking. But probably good for drag.

Yep. It's still the eyes. This is better than most efforts, but there's still something amiss... it's amazing how powerful the human brain is at identifying these kinds of differences.

"The fastest propeller-driven compound helicopter in the world, the Eurocopter X³..."

Just make sure it's not climate change you're talking about, or those skeptical "other geniuses" are then called "kooks and flat-earthers." Science it just as much politics these days as everything else.

Yes, we will buy it. Because we're stupid and have bad taste. And that's what this vehicle is.

Too big, too gaudy, too expensive. And I honestly don't know why I need one. Get to work on fixing our TV already, Apple...

This is a dumb movement. YOU made the decision to go to college, so YOU pay for it. Don't cry about it. A college education isn't a right, so let's not confuse it with one. For as much as it costs, it's a shame they didn't teach you that.

Contrary to popular belief, a college tuition should NOT be for everyone. Because as soon as everyone has one, there's no longer any differentiation. And then what... everyone needs a 6 year degree. Then 8 year... it's stupid. Some people don't need to go to college. And they're better off for it. For others who

So, when asked if you meant "reason" or "purpose" to your original question, you said "I mean both." Then, you said, "purpose is subjective... I'm not interested in that."

In fairness, those do serve a purpose... on the upper-end GC's that have them (lower-end models do not), they conceal the headlight washers that pop-out.

Here's some advice: use terms correctly so you are taken more seriously. For example, a "blog" is a website. A "blog post" is a story within that website. So, don't turn your advice into a blog, turn it into a blog post. Or, in this case, a blog post comment.

Pssst, no. But can we call you one for making a sexist assumption of such?

I suppose this was meant as satire, but it was childish and inane satire, at best. The fact is, not everyone takes nude selfies. Being a celebrity likely makes these people more inclined to do so, simply because they're somewhat vain and crave attention (that's why they're celebrities). What happened to them wasn't

Yep. Human Torch was the first thing that popped into my head.

Yeah, but what's really unfortunate is that he's mostly right.

Um, no. It's not bullets that's the problem. It's personal responsibility and a disdain for the rule of law. That's like saying because people die in car accidents, clearly objects with wheels need to be eliminated.