This is one of the best car ads I've seen in years... and one of the best ads, in general. Screw you, European Socialism and your 14% unemployment.
This is one of the best car ads I've seen in years... and one of the best ads, in general. Screw you, European Socialism and your 14% unemployment.
You had me at: "Yes, you can order a manual."
Not on your life... sorry, but the current Abarth is a sh*tbox as it is (I badly wanted one, until I drove one and found out for myself). Removing any hint of sound deadening or NVH suppression will only expose the rattle-trap underneath.
Agreed. R56 owner here... the fat, overweight 2014 model is a real turn-off. Glad I got into a 2013 while I could. I'll hang into it forever if MINI keeps on pooping out turds like the 2014 model.
Looks like a Panda, smells like a Panda... but hey, it has a Jeep grill, so it must be a Jeep!
My thoughts, exactly. If you're on the ground (and have gravity), a mech makes sense. In space, it would be completely pointless. I didn't see any ground combat here to justify the extra weight and complexity a transforming battle platform would require.
Yes... yes... yes... yes...yes yes yes yes yes
...
YESSSSSSSS.
Luke, both Transformers and Nerf (example of two of Hasbro's toys for boys) are actually doing quite well, and the market overall is growing internationally: http://www.blasterlabs.com/2014/02/hasbro…
It deserves to be here. It's cheap (anti-Mercedes), and it has shapes that look like someone melted a regular Mercedes into something amorphous (just look at the drooping sides, rear and front face... what a disaster).
And then they will make a small one, which will be the Maxi Mini Cooper. And then the S variant. And JCW. And GP.
What's not to get? It's a MINI, which is small. So you make the MINI big, but still call it MINI. That's obviously how you get more customers.
Yeah, no. Sorry, BMW, we did not ask for more space. People that asked for more space are not MINI customers, they are customers of other brands who say they can't get a MINI because they are too small (usually having never owned one).
Pfft... try "Gunship" or "F-15 Strike Eagle," young'in...
No one likes to hear this, but Nintendo simply needs a more powerful, x86-based console that developers will support. Combine that with awesome first-party games and they'll have a winner. It's really that simple.
I keep throwing money at the screen, and nothing is happening.
When I was in the Boy Scouts in the late 1980s, our troop went to the Aberdeen proving grounds in Maryland. While there, we were treated to a spectacle of American firepower, including an M1 Abrams that must have been doing around 25 mph while jumping over dirt hills and firing... sideways. And still hitting targets.
I was a victim of that day one patch... and it should have told me everything I needed to know about Nintendo's preparedness for not just the future, but gaming today. I sold the U a couple months later. Good riddance.
Can I get it with a 6-speed manual AND with 4WD and all the goodies (not a stripper base model), like I have in my Tacoma TX|Pro (or even like you can also get in the Frontier)? No? Ok then... still not a contender.
Unlike Nintendo, SEGA should have stayed in the hardware business. The Dreamcast was so ahead of its time I run mine through a 120" projection screen (via VGA) and it STILL looks good! In fact, I've played it more than my Xbox One, recently.