Ok, fair enough

I don't understand the point you're making. If you fear your life is in danger, you can shoot the person. This case is not about that. This man didn't fear his life was in danger. He shot someone in the back as they were leaving over a contractual dispute.

Yep. He should be charged with murder committed during robbery, or whatever it's called.

The title of this article calls the victim a prostitute. She was an escort, who charged $150 an evening for her company. This isn't an instance of a prostitute who took the money and ran away without performing the agreed upon acts. The issue here is that the man believed he was entitled to sex. That's not what she…

It has nothing to do with being a pubic hair enthusiast and everything to do with you being immature.

Grossness in general applies to you.

Thank you!

Thank you for clarifying this! Can a baby survive when delivered at 5 months? I understand this baby isn't likely to survive anyway...

Why would she need permission to get a C-section?

Hahaa is that why?!

Is number 3 missing or is it just me?

Well, it's good that your friend's teacher explained that condoms aren't 100% effective. I can't imagine someone, even a teenager, deciding not to use condoms only because they learned they were only 98%(?) effective. However if the teacher was exaggerating the flaws of condoms to promote abstinence, I can see how a…

Excellent point

You say it's too bad, but it sounds like you don't really care

I read that he told everyone, including his mother, that the little girl was his girlfriend's daughter. Still, very strange for his mother not to enquire further.

I think people are mostly reacting to the fact that tweeting news has been commonplace for some time now - see the Boston bombing coverage - and for the most part I think Twitter is a good medium for news. Maybe not for in-depth editorials but for brief snippets of important facts, sure. That said, I don't think your…

What do you mean by this?

Exactly what I was wondering

Ok, I can understand what you're saying. The aesthetics of the line is definitely young.

Only girls over 18 should be able to buy underwear?