Right, but you're saying that VS is profiting from the sexualization of children. They can't control who buys their product, but they aren't participating in the sexualization of children if they're using college-aged models.

I want to alcohol lesbians with YOU

Haha!

+1

lmao

amazing!

What does it meeeean?

We're only talking about it because the dude got fired. So, after word got back to his boss.

Of course it's not her job, but it's her right. Also, I'm tired of calling everything "public shaming". People behaving badly *in public* shouldn't expect privacy, and shouldn't be shocked when word of their behavior at a conference gets back to their bosses.

Since I wrote that in response to a comment stating that "everyone willfully misunderstood", the "we" refers to the commenters, including myself, who she claims misunderstood. Again, the freedom to live our lives is great, and it's one I cherish. That doesn't mean it has anything to do with feminism.

I don't know; it's not her job to give them a "warning". They should know how to behave at professional events.

I don't disagree with a lot of what you've said. Calling the OP a child or stupid is certainly unproductive and rude. However, her comment was in response to the article itself, and not to another reader's comment. The way she framed her comment implied that she took issue with the article for criticizing SAHMs, which…

I haven't read all the comments, but the one by Boudicca80 suggests that this article is about how choosing to stay at home is incompatible with feminism. It's not about that. It's about how being "grateful for traditional gender roles" or believing that women are more naturally suited to cook, clean and raise…

None of what who said makes sense? You? the author of the article? The commenter above you?

So bad, but so good

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you didn't read the article either

I think you misunderstood the article. Not once did TEM criticize women who choose to stay at home. She only pointed out how idiotic and sexist it is to assume that women are naturally suited to stay at home. Nobody said you can't be a feminist and a SAHM. You need to re-read the article.

Thank you!

What article did you read? The one above criticizes sexist, antiquated notions such as women being naturally better than men at parenting, cleaning and cooking.

No, it isn't.