“I literally made a distinction between aziz and Weinstein/lauer”

A distinction of race, not of action or character.

I guess that’s a no.

“Of course you do.”

“I mean, yeah... a man of color doesn’t have the same ability to publicly defend himself in the same way the Harvey Weinsteins and matt lauers of the world can.”

“As others have said, “assimilate” in this case has the not-so-subtle meaning of “be white.””

“You don’t think Immigrants contribute?”

Where on earth did you get this idea? Certainly not from anything I wrote.

“Yeah, that’s how racist dog whistle code works.”

“A hint: where it talks about “the apprehension of harm”, they’re not talking about the aggressor’s perceptions. They’re talking about the victim’s.”

I support this idea.

“She means “be white.””

You don’t think immigrants should assimilate or contribute?

Michael is a hypocrite.

How is following you (so that I can see what you’re writing about me) harassment?

Can you clarify which man who sexually assaulted a woman I was standing for?

Of course, babe! I want to get the ‘other’ take on things. I’m open minded like that.

You’ve starred hundreds of my comments, Rooo. I’ve got your #, babe.

I take back what I said about your intelligence. Clearly, I was mistaken.

Hachi loves Weinstein.

Yes means yes and blowjobs mean consent.

You’re usually smarter than this “Hachi”.