@TheGM: 640k gives me plenty of memory headroom.

@funstraw: This "nobody can distinguish between 720p and 1080p" business is ridiculous. Can YOU tell the difference between 1280x720 and 1920x1080 on your computer?

@wild homes loves you but chooses darkness!: From the Amazon terms:

@Paradise: Oh, the 6600. As antiquated as it may be now, I have fond memories of that handset, and used it for nearly five years after upgrading from my 8200. Say what you will about Series 60, but in an era of horrific and mostly-incomprehensible proprietary phone OSes, Symbian was awfully intuitive. And yes, that…

@Paradise: Oh, the 6600. As antiquated as it may be now, I have fond memories of that handset, and used it for nearly five years after upgrading from my 8200. Say what you will about Series 60, but in an era of horrific and mostly-incomprehensible proprietary phone OSes, Symbian was awfully intuitive. And yes, that…

@lord_randal: The proper argument is the one where you make a "backup copy" of games you own legally, and then use those copies exclusively, while locking your originals up in a safe deposit box. (Or so they tell me)

@guineapirate: Although I may have previously agreed with you, a few months back I rented a car with the current-gen Sync software and I was actually fairly impressed with how effective (and intuitive) it was.

@RicketyCricket: Well played.

@vinod1978: Perhaps what Kaiser meant to say is that Android has already surpassed iOS in terms of _functionality_ in just about every respect.

@Kai Kadgien: If Google has determined beyond the shadow of a doubt that an app is dangerous enough malware to invoke their recall ability, it begs the question of why a user would ever answer "no" other than by accident. The choice, and by extension the dialog box, seems redundant.

It should probably be noted that this is a feature of the Android Market that was publicized since the launch day of the G1, giving Google the ability to 'recall' malicious applications that have been installed via the Market.