Fuck you, Reality. You suck.

I think this is a great perspective.

I wouldn’t be surprised that a bunch of comedians that are familiar with each other and have worked together are extremely clique-y, and that the clique incubated and defended caustic behaviours. I think the cast should own their involvement individually, but I think it’s also an indictment against the studio and…

Calling Wetterlund a costar is unfair, because Silicon Valley absolutely underutilized her (which, considering her perception of the time on the series and her castmates, might have worked out in her favour).

The scenes certainly don’t contribute to the ZSJL brouhaha, but MM’s appearance is some heavy-handed foreshadowing to the likely never-to-be-seen sequels. MM made some remark after seeing Louis about how important she is, and later on (in the epilogue I believe) there’s mention of Louis’ death, which MM seems to know…

The better option is tax the piss out of them, because nobody should have that level of wealth, and the ever-growing chasm between them and the average household is way to vast.

You’re assumption, grounded on absolutely nothing, is that her consent, or in this situation, specific lack thereof is null and void because ‘club rules’.

If Dowd or Ignatiy give a grade like this to a genre film, they’re being pretty positive.

I normally don’t feel as confounded by a trailer as I was when I first saw the one for Nobody, and Dowd giving it a grade above C is only more confounding.

Fair perspective to have- though I’d say he’ll continue to presently be a bastard until his campaigns against racial groups, LGBT, and gender equality no longer affect those communities, and the thought of the cretin dies away in the CHUDs that worship him.

I guess it’s also just that I don’t cross over in the same social medias as younger people, and the comment sections I waste my time in skew older than me. It’s probably nowhere near as common as I think.

lol too fair. Both are garbage films, i mixed them together because I never watch them.

Is this a side-splitter for the American Gen-X crowd? I didn’t have access to SNL in the 90s in rural Canada, so I only saw this joke as a meme from a bygone era- how does this have such lasting power when the majority of people nowadays have little reference of who Norm is, let alone Frank Stallone?

I don’t disagree about the concept, it’s a bit amateur and overdone for sure. I meant more that there is a lot that is promising in what they did with how they shot it- the audio and visuals really gave a creepy ambience, it pulls off that feeling when you’re suddenly alone in a grimy place and feel super…

A good friend, who I previously rented a room off of, binged Food Network while she was crafting or gaming, and I caught a good chunk to see the monotony of the pre-commercial cliffhanger phenomena; it would drive me insane to watch that so much. I don’t judge anybody who does though, I am sure there’s plenty that…

They could really have cut that bit from the beginning, without it I think it’d be more fun watching it unravel.

America definitely does a good job of producing some of the worst CHUDs around today, but us Western brethren do a great job of not lagging too far behind, what with your JK Rowlings, Graham Linehans, Tommy Robinsons; And us Canadians, with our Jordan Petersons, Stefan Molyneux, Faith Goldys.

‘I never thought leopards would eat MY face,’ sobs [production company] who [cast a leopard from the Leopards Eating People’s Faces family]

Damn, if you listed that all from the top of your head, you’re cut from a different cloth.

Hannity is such a disgrace, even amongst neocons. Say what you will about Rush Limbaugh (please do, he’s a fucking bastard that I wish there was a hell for), but all these people that came after him are such pathetic imitations of him. Hannity and Carlson, Pirro and Ingraham, they’re all the failed clone attempts that…