ieatpatriarchyforbreakfast
ieatpatriarchyforbreakfast
ieatpatriarchyforbreakfast

Yeah, but Amber is black and edgy, and Taylor is white and conventional, and the culture here sometimes resembles 8th grade in that it’s all about who the cool kids are. Amber’s cool, Taylor’s not, and supposedly grown women form opinions based on that.

I think clover really doesnt like taylor and doesnt want to give her credit at all. I also feel she took this tone to piss commenters off and get clicks.

I know it’s not cool on here to like taylor, but damn clover did she kill your dog or something? You are salty as fuck.

Can you guys take like 5 minutes to not take a cheap shot at Taylor? I know it’s really hard (what does this company have against her anyway?) but just compliment her for an amazing speech and a well-deserved win and move on.

Exactly what I was thinking. Personal feelings about TSwift aside, how is a woman asserting herself and taking (deserved) credit for her own accomplishments something to mock or deem “insufferable”?

Still don’t think “1989" was Grammy worthy, but this was a nice female empowerment speech.

But why can’t Taylor stand up for herself? I’m sure if it was one of us we would’ve done the same thing up on that stage and maybe not as nicely either.

I have a hard time on a feminist blog finding a way to be anything but Team Taylor on this one. She may have an incredibly planned public persona and is annoyingly twee (can we PLEASE retire #squadgoals forever ??), but Kanye is the literal worst.

Fucking good for her. I'd be pissed if some egomaniacal dude was trying to take credit for my massive success too. This is the most I've ever liked Taylor Swift.

Are you sure we are talking about the same Stephen Fry? Because that prudishness is a very shallow.

Prude?! The man is a saucepot.

Here’s a list of things the Obama administration have done for the LGBT community (SPOILER ALERT- it’s fairly extensive). Not shown is the fact that some of those things took awhile to happen because the administration was trying to figure out how to make those changes in a way that any incoming Republican

Same! But won’t it be a conflict of interest when President Michelle Obama appoints him in 2025?

And exactly why is that? Amy (I have known her for some time) has done lots of roles that did not involve nudity and those that did were very soft core. I would say that many “mainstream” actresses have been far more explicit. Angelina Jolie, Sharon Stone, Kristen Wiig, Linda Fiorentino - just to name a few. Should

Now playing

He reminds me of Pappy O’Daniel for some reason.

As much as it pains me to defend Kanye West, what a crock of shit. If a guy outs an ex-girlfriend for liking a certain sex act, we’d say he was slut-shaming her, regardless of whether or not in a perfect world she should have anything for which to feel ashamed. She’s using homophobia against him, period. Not just his

Because 15-year-olds shouldn’t have 12 million dollars.

Probably to give her time to prepare to be responsible with it.

I mean, I get that line of thinking, but let’s keep it 100: why would she keep bringing that up if it wasn’t to try to shame him? Why would it be shameful?

I'm really disappointed that this article did not cover anything about Juan Pablo's obvious emotional abuse of these women. He proved controlling, manipulative, and dominating from the start. Nikki looked like a battered woman last night in the way she consistently deferred to him and seemed to blindly follow his