Yup, it’s a myth alright! Biggest choke in SB history, the Pats offense AND defense shut you down and now the excuses shall begin...

And yet you’re nowhere to be found, how surprising...hot shot.

No dipshit, they “didn’t look like the same team”, Nelson was literally wearing armor to protect himself and they lost 4 guys within the first quarter, dumbass. And “garbage time”?? What fucking “improved defense gives up 19 points in the 4th quarter in a game they NEEDED to win to secure a 1st round bye??!!

Your ‘historic’ offense was held to less than 25 points, this had nothing to do with Atlanta “getting hot” (see last game of season), more to do with playing two teams missing either their best player or TONS of players.

I’m not sure KC would get by NE at home, they literally kicked the Steelers out of the stadium, while putting up 34 on a better Texans defense. My point about the Bucs is that SB caliber teams SHOULD beat 9-7 teams, not need to justify it.

Get off the internet you’re drunk. In those 8 games you played exactly ONE great offense, the Saints...and gave up almost 500 yds. of offense. Are you seriously trying to imply that both Seattle and GB had as good of offenses and defenses as the Pats?? GB was flat out deplted on both sides, and Seattle had just put…

Theoretically they are if you are implying those were the same two teams you played close earlier in the year. Earl Thomas going down killed ANY chance Seattle had of going to the SB, and at the time were favored ABOVE Atlanta.

Better than any player on your team, unless you think Jones’ whole 6 TDs is impressive?? Christ, our “decent” TE and RB had 20 more than that.

Obviously your “improved defense” didn’t, they gave up 19 in the 4th qtr. alone.

They faced Big Ben, Carson Palmer, Joe Flacco, Andy Dalton and Russell Wilson....four of which were in the top 11 for total yardage, while Atlanta faced 5...THAT is your big fucking point??!!

Dude stop being such a homer with all of this “woulda, shoulda, coulda” schtick...they lost AT HOME to the Chargers, along with the crappy Eagles. Not to mention KC and the Bucs which are teams you SHOULD beat if you’re so good. The Pats lost a game to the 7-9 Bills with their 3rd stringer, THAT is a valid excuse.…

Most likely won’t happen, esp. with their coach. There’s a reason why Vegas picked them to win, and it has NOTHING to do with politics.

IIRC Atlanta was playing for a 1st rd. bye and a #2 seed, the last thing you do is let off the gas at home against a dominant offense, so getting outscored 19-3 in the 2nd half is a bit weird.

...then why wasn’t Atlanta at least 14-2 or 15-1 if they were so “good”? Because their schedule clearly showed they couldn’t put up points against great defenses (Seattle and Denver, both under 25) and their defense could only shut down horrible offenses (Rams, Niners and Panthers under 20). You really think Seattle…

They also gave up over 150 more points than NE, yet the Pats scored only 100 less...with Brady out 4 games, otherwise these offenses would be identical.

Dude, GB is NOWHERE close to NE on a talent level on both sides of the ball, and Brady missing a quarter of the season has been more consistent overall. The fact that the Packers were so depleted and their best player was literally bubblewrapped didn’t prove Atlanta was far better. Face it, Atlanta was only 11-5…

They were obviously upset because she wouldn’t allow them to rape her while their friends filmed/participtaed. She’s obviously “a frigid white bitch”.

It was road rage dummy, the shooter wasn’t the one that cut off the victim, and they BOTH pulled over! If you feel that you are in danger you call police, NOT pull over and resolve it yourselves.