...and the mother had 3 warrants out on her, so stop acting like the video is showing him immediately tackling her to the ground. She was the one that got pissed off over someone questioning her son littering, the last thing she should be doing is mouthing off to cops with multiple warrants out on her. And that…

Per the report, the neighbor grabbed his arm, he refused to pick up the litter then grabbed him by the back of the neck. he also called 911, hence why he was interviewed first. The cop didn’t state it was made up, he just didn’t know to what level an assault had occured (in the above report he stated there were other…

She admitted he tossed raisins on the ground, which the neighbor mistakenly took as paper, that is FACT. Again, you keep implying that I am justifying his behavior when I never have. The cop’s behavior can most likely be based on his actual report above, that stated he had run her name and she had multiple warrants.…

If he nevers first litters there is no interaction to begin with. If there was previously, the mother would’ve immediately told the officer. I’ve never justified his actions, I stated that it only happened because of the littering, you can clearly see he was in the middle of painting a fence. You’re adding other…

She would’ve mentioned this, yet didn’t. Secondly he lives two doors down and everything you’ve stated is pure speculation.

Somehow you managed to be wrong twice in one comment.

Who is “they”?? ONE person called her a young woman and in the VERY NEXT SENTENCE said “She might be a young girl”.

“Putting hands on” and “choking” isn’t the same offense. If I push you and you then start choking the life out of me...is that the same use of force? Being a mother doesn’t mean that you accept their story by default that they DIDN’T litter, she was the one that became upset that anyone would even question it, when…

The video clearly shows him currently painting a fence, he’s lived there two doors down for years (confirmed by mother), knows them (confirmed by mother), and your stance is he randomly assaulted the kid “because black”?

Right, he gets to the scene, sees an uninjured 7 y.o. then asks the mother what happened. She immediately goes into defense mode when questioned if he littered (he did), stating it was irrelevent when in actuality it was what led to the neighbor’s actions. No one is claiming he didn’t overreact, but the mother did…

Choking and grabbing by the neck aren’t one in the same, that was my point. I’m not accepting that what he did was right, I was pointing out that the mother simply dismissed her son’s initial actions which actually prompted the neighbor’s response i.e “cause and effect”.

I have to agree somewhat with the officer though when he stated that it was more plausible he was grabbed by the neck as opposed to “choked” since she didn’t even call for medical attention, and the simple fact that by default she immediately went into defend mode for her son says alot. People that have little if any…

She died in vain knowing it wasn’t worth living another 4 years...

...then what are your feelings about MJ? Because regardless of his skin issues, he made every attempt to erase his prominent AA features, thinning his nose, straightening his afro, cheek implants and a chin cleft.

I bet she’d wished this happened 77 days ago.

...what about a ball gag?

And far less obviously to get into Mel-a-Nia...

In my opinion the better yet underrated film: