This is wildly inaccurate and incredibly stupid

Misogynist troll💩, HP only exists because of his feminist creator, who took issue with “people who menstruate” & wrote that she wants trans to be safe & live their best lives. Her non-existent “transphobia” has been repeatedly repudiated by those who can actually READ.

The reality that a lot of terminally online far-left people don’t want to face is that the majority of the population does not consider anything JK Rowling has said to be transphobic or bigoted. Most people agree with her views. The majority of people do not think trans women should be competing in women’s sports…

I get that this point is purely about sticking it to trans people, but even if she wasn’t a shitheel this comment would be such peak millenial brainrot. Yes, the baby wizard books lady is the greatest author of our generation because it was the only long book you, personally, have ever bothered to finish.

Transvestites killed by the Nazis were all either gay or Jewish. The idea that people were targetted for being trans in the modern sense when the concept was unheard of at the time is ridiculous.

I follow a Twitter account that details the life of one Jewish holocaust victim each day. It will take 16 thousand years for them to list them all. A similar account documenting trans victims of the Nazis would be finished by Tuesday.

And Hogwarts Legacy was the best selling game of 2023 despite all the internet crybullies demanding a boycott. NORMAL PEOPLE DON’T CARE ABOUT ROWLING’S POLITICS.

I recommend you watch the movie Denial starring Rachel Weisz, it based on a true story where professor got sued by a Holocaust denier and she had to prove he was Holocaust denier in British court.

From Wikipedia:

I’ll admit I don’t know much about compositing, but I thought the costumes were pretty, as were the people wearing them.

He should have gone with his fake Spanish one he used in The Princess Bride.

I watched half this, hopeful. The 4 episodes I watched were, well, boring. There was no sense of place, the characters weren’t interacting, and for some reason there was some background intrigue that didn’t seem interesting.

That’s an obvious lie. He gave positive reviews to multiple slashers. He gave Halloween 4/4 stars. Most slashers are garbage, and giving bad reviews to garbage movies is not “moral panic.”

The masks are saturated with Illuminati-engineered micro-chemtrails. Every time you exhale through a mask, it disperses a cloud of woke mind virus particles.

Anyone that is that insistent that they aren’t drunk is absolutely drunk. In other news, what an utter child. 

Yeah, I love a lot of 70s and 80s horror because they may have lacked in acting or basic storytelling coherence but they delivered on things like creative budget creature design and memorable kills. The first movie sucked at all of the above.

Exactly. The first was what most of us expected.  A cheap gimmicky cash grab with no heart.   I suspect this one isn’t going to be much better.   80 schlock horror had heart, which the first one of these didn’t even attempt to have 

Yeah, no to all of this. The original Blood and Honey genuinely sucked, a bog-standard generic slasher movie that thought just putting Pooh and Piglet masks on the killers would be enough to count, and with an unforgivably abrupt “not even trying” ending. It’s great if the sequel improves on that, truly, but let’s not…

Man I liked Danny Palumbo! What did you do with him and why was he replaced with this weird snarky food gatekeeping writer that is also completely incorrect? I hope you used AI for this because otherwise it is a very sad use of your time and talents.

Editor:”hey guys, can we write another dumb gatekeeping article about Texans and beans in chili?