The Hedgerows.

No.

Do you mean century?

No. No one thinks that. There is not a single economist alive that thinks that.

Don’t ever give investment advice. Ever.

At the capital gains rate.

Are car purchases taxed at 25 percent?

For your argument to work, anything you spend money on would have to be taxed at the same rate as capital gains. There is no other product that you can spend your already taxed money on that is taxed at a rate even close to the capital gains rate. I get what you’re trying to say, but the reality doesn’t work that way.

That is not what trickle down theory is. Trickle down is supply side economics. This is not that.

That’s actually exactly what it means

How much weed did you smoke yesterday

Unless she’s got a dick the size of a hand I don’t think she’s holding that flag...

The words my step-dad told me will live forever in my brain. “Never swerve to miss hitting an animal.....unless it’s a skunk!! wrap that sonofabitch around a telephone pole before you hit one of those smelly motherfuckers.”

There’s technically only two things that the fed is responsible for overseeing. Unemployment and Inflation.

You’re view is actually a very simplified and also incorrect view of a complex issue. The government wanting inflation is not a dirty little secret. The target is 2% annually and it’s been that way for awhile. Very very public. The other person who responded is correct. If wages rise then this will cause a supply…

Try to keep up on this ok. I’m not saying Obama fucked the military, I was responding that that was what Bunta was essentially saying. He continually said that our military is a mess and I simply replied that Obama was the CINC for the last eight years and he’s responsible for the state of the military. Make sense now?

Did you just try to correct me and completely fail?? You’re was the right usage in that sentence, not your. “You’re essentially saying....”I.E. you are essentially saying. That’s just embarrassing.

The volt is neither equally fun, nor interesting. As evidenced by your own articles dedicated to each.

Would the money be spent on healthcare? The answer is no. No is the answer. Again, you rebut your own argument. Any other tax is spent on discretionary items. Logic is hard I guess.

You’re adorable in your naïveté.