icanneverremembermyburnercode
icanneverremembermyburnercode
icanneverremembermyburnercode

You’re view is actually a very simplified and also incorrect view of a complex issue. The government wanting inflation is not a dirty little secret. The target is 2% annually and it’s been that way for awhile. Very very public. The other person who responded is correct. If wages rise then this will cause a supply

Try to keep up on this ok. I’m not saying Obama fucked the military, I was responding that that was what Bunta was essentially saying. He continually said that our military is a mess and I simply replied that Obama was the CINC for the last eight years and he’s responsible for the state of the military. Make sense now?

Did you just try to correct me and completely fail?? You’re was the right usage in that sentence, not your. “You’re essentially saying....”I.E. you are essentially saying. That’s just embarrassing.

The volt is neither equally fun, nor interesting. As evidenced by your own articles dedicated to each.

Would the money be spent on healthcare? The answer is no. No is the answer. Again, you rebut your own argument. Any other tax is spent on discretionary items. Logic is hard I guess.

You’re adorable in your naïveté.

Boom. Exactly.

You do realize that the president is the CINC right? You’re essentially saying that Obama fucked the military in the ass for eight years, now look at how terribly ran the military is. Shame! Here’s the kicker though, despite best efforts, our military is still the strongest, most agile, most competent force in the

No you’re not. Not in the least.

Yes. A military that has been neglected for the last eight years. The ironic thing in this whole conversation, is everything you criticize the military for can be easily solved with more funding. 😉 Just like healthcare; social security; infrastructure; environmental projects; etc etc.

No. You’re basing your whole thesis on one operation. Everything else you’ve espoused is easily refutable nonsense.

No. The budget for social security and healthcare is set by congress. It’s over 50% of the entire federal budget. The rest is divided between everything else. If they spent less on the military it would go towards other discretionary budgets. Not healthcare or social security. You have no idea how any of this works.

No my argument is correct. By your own admission, the us military sells their equipment there by recouping some of the expenditures in their budget. The US is absolutely the best trained and the most readily armed force in the world. Prove me wrong on this. Size has no correlation to management or leadership, you are

Exactly! Thank you for proving my point that spending on the military does not impact spending on healthcare and social security!!! Great job!

Single payer is not cheaper or more efficient. Look at tax rates in those countries. Also, tuitions didn’t start to skyrocket until financial aid dramatically increased. It’s not the other way around. There is a direct correlation between the increase in tuition assistance and the cost of tuition. There is no

Are you kidding me right now? Just google defense programs cancelled due to budgets. Or even the F-22 or the entire military after WW2

In every instance private business operates more efficiently that government run programs. The reason you have no statistics is because they do not exist. Most people who have insurance through their employer have a max amount they can be charged each year, so no, they are not ruined financially for the rest of their

Nope. Not to mention they’re using equipment that we gave them. You know, the equipment that we spent money on to develop.

I’m not talking about pharmaceuticals.

Name one country that isn’t a totalitarian state that maintains a state of alertness equal to the United States. Allow me to give you a hint. The carrier force the U.S. Just sent towards North Korea has more strike power than the totality of the RAF. And again, the military is not the only department that wastes